Rapid rescreen: A viable alternative to 1:10?

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 219-221

  Dudding, Nick ^a  

^a Northern Yorkshire Regional Cytology Training School   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

False negative smears; Quality control; Rapid screening

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SCREENING;

FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; QUALITY CONTROL; REFERENCE VALUES; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0035124127     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0339(200103)24:3<219::AID-DC1045>3.0.CO;2-Z     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Rapid cervical cytology screening
2. Partial rescreening of all negative smears: An improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening
3. Rapid review (partial rescreening) of cervical cytology. Four years experience and quality assurance implications
4. Role of rescreening of cervical smears in internal quality control
5. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears: An improved method of quality control
6. Rapid screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control. For how long should we rescreen?
7. An assessment of partial rescreening as an internal quality control method for cervical smears
8. The sensitivity of rapid (partial) review of cervical smears
9. Differences between Papanicolaou smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses
10. The characteristics of false negative cervical smears - Implications for the UK cervical screening programme
11. Rapid screening: A comparitive study of English laboratories