Improving quality of anesthesia care: Opportunities for the new decade

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 6-11

  Macario, Alex ^a   Vasanawala, Ami ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIST; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL FEE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MORBIDITY; ORGANIZATION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIOLOGY; CANADA; HUMANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 0035122855     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03019807     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. What do patients value in their anesthesia care? The view of outpatients and anesthesiologists
2. Setting performance standards for an anesthesia department
3. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients
4. Consumerism rampant: A critique of the view of medicine as a commercial enterprise
5. Patient is King
6. An experimental application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts
7. Friendliness of OR staff is top determinant of patient satisfaction with outpatient surgery
8. Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance
9. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are both common and important to avoid? The perspective of a panel of expert anesthesiologists
10. Willingness to pay for antihypertensive therapy - Results of a Swedish pilot study
11. What do patients value? Willingness to pay for ultrasound in normal pregnancy
12. Risk reduction from low osmolality contrast media. What do patients think it is worth?
13. Preoperative anxiety and fear: A comparison of assessments by patients and anesthesia and surgery residents
14. Variation in patient utilities for outcomes of the management of chronic stable angina. Implications for clinical practice guidelines