메뉴 건너뛰기
Health Policy
Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 65-79
Adoption of new health care services in Norway (1993-1997): Specialists' self-assessment according to national criteria for priority setting
Author keywords

Health care rationing; Health policy; Health technology assessment
Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH STATUS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NORWAY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHORT SURVEY; TECHNOLOGY;
EID: 0035108595     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8510(00)00135-4     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (11)
References (28)
  • 1
    • 0005897927 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Norges Offentlige Utredninger. Guidelines for priority setting in the Norwegian health care system. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1987. p. 23 [in Norwegian].
  • 2
    • 0005849219 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Choices in Health Care. A Report by the Government Committee on Choices in Health Care. The Netherlands: Ministry of Welfare, Health and Cultural Affairs, 1992.
  • 3
    • 0005897056 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Priorities in Health Care - Ethics, Economy, Implementation. Statens offentliga utredningar No 5. Stockholm: Regjeringskansliets offsetcentral, 1995.
  • 5
    • 0032505636 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care
    • (1998) British Medical Journal , vol.317 , Issue.7164 , pp. 1000-1002
    • Holm, S.1
  • 6
    • 0005845816 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Holm S. Solidarity, justice, and health care priorities. In: Szawarski Z, Evans D, editors. Solidarity, Justice and Health Care Priorities. Linköping: Health Service Studies, vol. 8, 1993. pp. 53-64.
  • 8
    • 0005906002 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Norges Offentlige Utredninger. Prioritering på ny. Gjennomgang av retningslinjer for prioriteringer innen norsk helsetjeneste. NOU. Report No. 18. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste. Statens trykking, 1997. p. 18 [in Norwegian].
  • 10
    • 0031568695 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The rationing debate. Defining a package in healthcare services the NHS is responsible for. The case against
    • (1997) British Medical Journal , vol.314 , Issue.7079 , pp. 506-509
    • Klein, R.1
  • 11
    • 0005814582 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Norheim O. Guidelines for priority-setting in the Norwegian health care system. In: Szawarski Z, Evans D, editors. Solidarity, Justice and Health Care Priorities. Linköping: Health Service Studies, vol. 8, 1993. pp. 65-76.
  • 13
    • 0005895440 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National Advisory Committee on Core Health and Disability Support Services. Position Statement - The Place of Guidelines. In: Fourth Annual Report. Wellington, New Zealand: National Advisory Committee on Core Health and Disability Support Services, 1995. pp. 10-17.
  • 15
    • 0005843487 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sosial og helsedepartementet. St.meld. nr. 26 (1999-2000) Om verdiar for den norske helsetenesta. Oslo, 1999.
  • 16
    • 0005906003 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sosial og helsedepartementet. Ot prp nr 12 (1998-1999) Lov om pasientrettigheter (pasientrettighetsloven). Oslo, 1998.
  • 21
    • 0002654164 scopus 로고
    • Checklists for review articles
    • Chalmers I., Altman D. (Eds.), Systematic Reviews, London: BMJ Publishing Group
    • (1995)
    • Oxman, A.1
  • 24
    • 0033610613 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Healthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?
    • (1999) British Medical Journal , vol.319 , Issue.7222 , pp. 1426-1429
    • Norheim, O.F.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.