Support and consultation for general practitioners concerning euthanasia: The SCEA project

Health Policy

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 33-48

  Onwuteaka Philipsen, Bregje D ^a   Van Der Wal, Gerrit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; EUTHANASIA; EVALUATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; TECHNIQUE;

DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; EUTHANASIA; HUMANS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SUICIDE, ASSISTED;

EID: 0035107982     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8510(00)00128-7     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. The request for assitance in dying. The need for psychiatric consultation
2. Physician-assisted suicide in Oregon. A bold experiment
3. A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States
4. Palliative options of last resort. A comparison of voluntary stopping eating and drinking, terminal sedation, physician-assisted suicide, and voluntary active euthanasiaa
5. Facing requests for physician-assisted suicide. Towards a practical and principled clinical skill set
6. The practice of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States
7. Psychiatry and assisted suicide in the United States
8. Evaluation of the notification procedure for physician-assisted death in the Netherlands
9. Support and consultation in cases of euthanasia in Amsterdam
10. Netherlands sets up euthanasia advisory body