Adjusting for regression effect in uncontrolled studies

Biometrics

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 178-181

  Naranjo, J D ^a   McKean, J W ^a  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Additive effects; Bootstrap confidence intervals; Dual effects; Multiplicative effects; Rank based estimation; Regression effect; Sampling with selection; Uncontrolled studies

Indexed keywords

PATIENT TREATMENT;

ADDITIVE EFFECTS; BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CLINICAL STUDY; DUAL EFFECT; MULTIPLICATIVE EFFECTS; RANK-BASED ESTIMATION; REGRESSION EFFECTS; SAMPLING WITH SELECTION; UNCONTROLED STUDY;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 0035099150     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00178.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Use of baseline data for estimation of treatment effects in the presence of regression to the mean
2. The regression fallacy
3. Correcting for regression in assessing the response to treatment in a selected population
4. Regression toward the mean in uncontrolled clinical trials
5. Use of historical marker data for assessing treatment effects in phase I/II trials when subject selection is determined by baseline marker level
6. Regression toward the mean and the paired sample t test
7. Estimating treatment effects in clinical trials subject to regression to the mean
8. Maximum likelihood estimation of treatment effects for samples subject to regression to the mean