Effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected sexual intercourse

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 184, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 531-537

  Rodrigues, Isabel ^a   Grou, Fabienne ^a   Joly, Jacques ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical study; Emergency contraception; Hormonal contraception; Postcoital contraception; Relative biologic effectiveness

Indexed keywords

ETHINYLESTRADIOL; NORGESTREL; POSTCOITUS CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 0035082199     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.111102     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. OCs provide emergency contraception option
2. Ethinvlestradiol and dl-norgestrel as a postcoital contraceptive
3. Mifepristone (RU 486) compared with high-dose estrogen and progestogen for emergency postcoital contraception
4. A prospective randomized comparison of levonorgestrel with the Yuzpe regimen in postcoital contraception
5. Randomised, controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception
6. Comparison of Yuzpe regimen, danazol and mifepristone (RU486) in oral postcoital contraception
7. Hormonal postcoital contraception with an ethinyl estradiol-norgestrel combination and two danazol regimens
8. The postcoital IUD as an effective continuing contraceptive method
9. The morning-after pill: How long after?
10. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation
11. The effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception
12. New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception