Modelling willingness to pay responses from dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys with zero observations

Applied Economics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 523-529

  Yoo, Seung Hoon ^a   Kwak, Seung Jun ^a   Kim, Tai Yoo ^a,b  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; MODELING; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0035080421     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840122117     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Efficiency vs bias of willingness-to-pay estimates: Bivariate and interval-data models
2. Tobit models: A survey
3. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation
4. Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good
5. Estimation using contingent valuation data from a 'dichotomous choice with follow-up' questionnaire
6. Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods
7. Limited dependent variables in willingness to pay studies: Applications in health care
8. Referendum models and economic values: Theoretical, intuitive, and practical bounds on willingness to pay
9. Differences between willingness-to-pay estimates from open-ended and discrete-choice contingent valuation methods: The effects of heteroscedasticity
10. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses
11. Some issues continuous- and discrete-response contingent valuation studies
12. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation
13. Sample selection bias as a specification error
14. Spike models in contingent valuation
15. Parametric and semiparametric modelling of vacation expenditures
16. Statistical approaches to the fat tail problem for dichotomous choice contingent valuation
17. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables
18. Allowing for zeros in dichotomous choice contingent valuation models
19. Dealing with zero response data from contingent valuation surveys: Application of least absolute deviations estimator
20. Dealing with bottled water expenditures data with zero observations: A semiparametric specification