Experimentation and modelling of HTTP over satellite channels

International Journal of Satellite Communications

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 51-68

  Kruse, Hans ^a   Allman, Mark ^b   Griner, Jim ^c   Tran, Diepchi ^c  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BBN TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^c NASA GLENN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIT ERROR RATE; COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); HTTP; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

GEOSYNCHRONOUS SATELLITE CHANNEL; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 0035079012     PISSN: 07372884     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sat.657     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Heidemann J, Obraczka K, Touch J. Modeling the performance of HTTP over several transport protocols. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 1997; 5(5):616-630.
2. Berners-Lee T, Fielding R, Nielsen H. Hypertext transfer protocol - HTTP/1.0, RFC 1945, May 1996.
3. Fielding R, Gettys J, Mogul JC, Frystyk H, Berners-Lee T. Hypertext transfer protocol - HTTP/1.1, RFC 2068. January 1997.
4. Allman M, Floyd S, Partridge C. Increasing TCP's initial window, RFC 2414. September 1998.
5. Allman M, Glover D, Sanchez L. Enhancing TCP over satellite channels using standard mechanisms, RFC 2488. January 1999.
6. Van Jacobson. Congestion avoidance and control. ACM SIGCOMM, 1988.
7. Stevens WR. TCP slow start, congestion avoidance, fast retransmit, and fast recovery algorithms, RFC 2001. January 1997.
8. Allman M, Paxson V, Stevens WR. TCP congestion control, RFC 2581. April 1999.
9. Postel J. Transmission control protocol, RFC 793. September 1981.
10. Van Jacobson. Modified TCP congestion avoidance algorithm. E-mail to the end2end-interest mailing list, April 1990, URL: ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/email/vanj.90apr30.txt.
11. Allman M. Fixing two BSD TCP bugs. Technical Report CR-204151, NASA Lewis Research Center, October 1997.
12. Mathis M, Mahdavi J, Floyd S, Romanow A. TCP selective acknowledgement options, RFC 2018. October 1996.
13. Paxson V, Allman M, Dawson S, Fenner W, Griner J, Heavens I, Lahey K, Semke J, VoIz B. Known TCP implementation problems, RFC 2525. March 1999.
14. Braden R. Requirements for internet hosts - communication layers, RFC 1122. October 1989.
15. Van Jacobson, Braden R, Borman D. TCP extensions for high performance, RCF 1323. May 1992.
16. Paxson V. Automated packet trace analysis of TCP implementations. ACM SIGCOMM, September 1997.
17. Allman M. On the generation and use of TCP acknowledgements. Computer Communication Review 1998; 28(5).
18. Mogul JC. The case for persistent-connection HTTP. ACM SIGCOMM 1995; 299-313.
19. Touch J, Heidemann J, Obraczka K. Analysis of HTTP performance. Technical Report, Information Sciences Institute, August 1996. http://www.isi.edu/lsam/publications/http-perf/.
20. Spero S. Analysis of HTTP performance problems, 1997. http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdma-release/http-prob.html.
21. Heidemann J. Performance interactions between P-HTTP and TCP implementations. Computer Communication Review (1997) 27(2):65-73.
22. Bauer R, vonDeak T. Advanced communications technology satellite (ACTS) and experiments program descriptive overview. Technical Report, NASA Lewis Research Center, 1991.
23. Allman M. Improving TCP performance over satellite channels. Master's Thesis, Ohio University, June 1997.
24. Floyd S, Fall K. Promoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the internet. Technical Report, LBL, February 1998.
25. Balakrishnan H, Padmanabhan V, Seshan S, Stemm M, Katz R. TCP behavior of a busy internet server: analysis and improvements. IEEE InfoCom 1998.