Hierarchicl linear models of factors associated with public participation among residents living near the US army's chemical weapons stockpile sites

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 41-65

  Williams, B L ^a   Suen, H K ^a   Brown, S ^a   Bruhn, R ^a   De Blaquiere, R ^a   Rzasa, S E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL WEAPON; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035078058     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560123460     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. An introduction to hierarchical linear models
2. A ladder of citizen participation
3. Credibility, public trust, and the transport of radioactive waste through local communities
4. Determinants of risk perceptions of a hazardous waste site
5. Determinants of public involvement among residents living near the Savannah River site
6. When stakeholders choose: Process, knowledge, and motivation in water quality decisions
7. Measuring the success of public participation on environmental restoration and waste management activities in the US Department of Energy
8. Technical assistance for citizen participation: A case study of New York City's environmental planning process
9. Environmental attitudes and environmental management behavior: An application of the theory of planned behavior
10. Emerging problems of citizen participation
11. Public involvement in hazardous waste siting decisions
12. Citizen participation and technocracy
13. Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues
14. Public perceptions of a radioactively contaminated site: Concerns, remediation preferences, and desired involvement
15. Redirecting the US high-level nuclear waste program
16. Predicting natural resources micro-protest
17. The consequences of mandating citizen participation
18. Effective public involvement in public decisions
19. The intention behavior relationship among US and Swedish voters
20. Hazardous waste site recommendation, neighborhood change, and neighborhood quality
21. Neighborhood quality, environmental hazards, personality traits, and resident actions
22. Geographical dimensions and correlates of trust
23. Neighborhood quality
24. Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior
25. The visual environment: Public participation in design and planning
26. The effects of appraised severity and efficacy in promoting water conservation: An informational analysis
27. Why not in my backyard? A radical interpretation of public opposition to the deep disposal of radioactive waste in the United Kingdom
28. Effects of enhanced calling efforts on response rates, estimates of health behavior, and costs in a telephone health survey using random-digit dialing
29. From conflict to communication? Public participation and critical communication as a solution to siting conflicts in planning for hazardous waste
30. Getting past yes: From capital creation to action
31. Democratizing risk management: Successful public involvement in local water management decisions
32. Multiattribute utility analysis as a framework for public participation in siting a hazardous waste management facility
33. Examining the relationships between voting behavior, intention, perceived behavioral control, and expectation
34. The answering machine generation. Who are they and what problem do they pose for survey research?
35. A comparison of the Kish and last birthday methods of respondent selection in telephone surveys
36. Improving random respondent selection in telephone surveys
37. Comparative risk assessment: Where does the public fit in?
38. Waste management strategy development: A case study of community involvement and consensus building in Hampshire
39. The public-expert interface in local management decisions: Expertise, credibility and process
40. Shaping regulations through public involvement opportunities
41. Public participation: Reflections on the California energy policy experience
42. Beyond the requirements: Improving public participation in EIA
43. Trends in non-response rates
44. Perception and acceptance of technological environmental risks: Why are poor countries less concerned?
45. Determinants of trust perceptions among residents surrounding the Savannah River nuclear weapons site
46. Risk perception in context: The Savannah River site stakeholder study
47. Teetering at the top of the ladder: The experience of citizen group participation in alternative dispute resolution processes