Remarks on the racetrack scheme: Stabilizing the moduli of string theory

Physical Review D

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2001, Pages

  Dine, Michael ^a   Shirman, Yuri ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COSMOS; MODEL; PARTICLE RADIATION; PREDICTION; QUANTUM MECHANICS; THEORY;

EID: 0035076655     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.046005     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. T. Banks and M. Dine, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5790 (1996).
2. M. Dine and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. 162B, 299 (1985).
3. E. Dudas, Phys. Lett. B 375, 189 (1996).
4. A. Niemeyer and H.P. Milles, "Gaugino Condensation and the Vacuum Expectation Value of the Dilaton," hep-th/9508173.
5. G. Dvali and Z. Kakushadze, Phys. Lett. B 417, 50 (1998).
6. A. Dabholkar and J.A. Harvey, J. High Energy Phys. 02, 006 (1999).
7. M. Dine and E. Silverstein, "New M Theory Backgrounds with Frozen Moduli," hep-th/9712166.
8. T. Banks and M. Dine, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7454 (1994).
9. M. Dine, Y. Nir, and Y. Shadmi, Phys. Lett. B 438, 61 (1998).
10. R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. D 59, 085010 (1999).
11. N.- Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D (to be published), hep-th/9809124.
12. T. Banks, M. Dine, and A. Nelson, J. High Energy Phys. 06, 014 (1999).
13. M. Dine, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 134, 1 (1999).
14. N.V. Krasnikov, Phys. Lett. B 193, 37 (1987);
15. L.J. Dixon, in The Rice Meeting: Proceedings, edited by B. Bonner and H. Miettinen (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
16. T.R. Taylor, Phys. Lett. B 252, 59 (1990).
17. B. de Carlos, J.A. Casas, and C. Munoz, Nucl. Phys. B399, 623(1993).
18. This idea has been presented most compellingly in V. Kaplunovsky and J. Louis, Phys. Lett. B 417, 45 (1998).
19. N. Seiberg (private communication).
20. T. Banks (private communication).
21. T. Banks, D.B. Kaplan, and A.E. Nelson, Phys. Rev. D 49, 779 (1994).
22. B. de Carlos, J.A. Casas, F. Quevedo, and E. Roulet, Phys. Lett. B 318, 447 (1993).
23. M. Dine, L. Randall, and S. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 398 (1995); Nucl. Phys. B458, 291 (1996).
24. K. Izawa and T. Yanagida, Prog. Theor. Phys. 101, 171 (1999).
25. T. Banks, "Remarks on M Theoretic Cosmology," hep-th/9906126.
26. M.K. Gaillard and V. Jain, Phys. Rev. D 49, 1951 (1994);
27. M.K. Gaillard, Phys. Lett. B 342, 125 (1995);
28. K. Choi, J.S. Lee, and C. Munoz, Phys. Rev. Lett. SO, 3686 (1998).
29. K. Choi, H.B. Kim, and C. Munoz, Phys. Rev. D 57, 7521 (1998).
30. S. Ferrara, L. Girardello, and H.P. Milles, Phys. Lett. 155B, 65 (1985);
31. M. Dine, R. Rohm, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. ibid. 156B, 55 (1985).
32. K. Choi, H.B. Kim, and H. Kim, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 125 (1998).
33. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B471, 135 (1996).
34. Such a possibility has been explored in J. Ellis, Z. Lalak, S. Pokorski, and S. Thomas, Nucl. Phys. B563, 107 (1999). However, in this case, it is assumed that supersymmetry is broken, so the issue of the calculability of the Kahler potential arises.
35. T. Banks and M. Dine, Nucl. Phys. B479, 173 (1996).
36. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Nucl. Phys. B557, 79 (1999).
37. T. Banks, M. Berkooz, S.H. Shenker, G. Moore, and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3548 (1995);
38. T. Banks, M. Berkooz, and P.J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D, ibid. 52, 705 (1995).
39. M. Dine and Y. Shirman, Phys. Rev. D 50, 5389 (1994).
40. C.P. Burgess, J.P. Derendinger, F. Quevedo, and M. Quiros, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 250, 193 (1996).
41. I. Antoniadis (private communication).