Geomagnetic paleosecular variation recorded in Plio-Pleistocene volcanic rocks from Possession Island (Crozet Archipelago, southern Indian Ocean)

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 106, Issue B2, 2001, Pages 1961-1971

  Camps, Pierre ^a   Henry, Bernard ^a,b   Prévot, Michel ^a   Faynot, Liliane ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; PALEOMAGNETISM; PLEISTOCENE; PLIOCENE; SECULAR VARIATION;

INDIAN OCEAN; POSSESSION ISLAND;

EID: 0035074867     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2000jb900370     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amerigian, C., N.D. Watkins, and B.B. Ellwood, Brunhes epoch geomagnetic secular variation on Marion Island: Contribution to evidence for a long-term regional geomagnetic secular variation maximum, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 26, 429-441, 1974.
2. Camps, P., and M. Prévot, A statistical model of the fluctuations in the geomagnetic field from paleosecular variation to reversal, Science, 273, 776-779, 1996.
3. Camps, P., R.S. Coe, and M. Prévot, Transitional geomagnetic impulse hypothesis: Geomagnetic fact or rock-magnetic artifact?, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 17,747-17,758, 1999.
4. Cande, S., and D.V. Kent, Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the late Cretaceous and Cenozoic, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 6093-6095, 1995.
5. Chevallier, L., Carte géologique au 1:50 000. Archipel Crozet, Ile de la Possession, Comité Nat. Fr. Rech. Antarct., 50, 16 pp., 1 map, 1981.
6. Chevallier, L., J. Nougier, and J.M. Cantagrel, Volcanology of Possession Island, Crozet Archipelago (TAAF), in Antarctic Earth Science, edited by R.L. Oliver et al., pp. 652-658, Cambridge Univ Press, New York,1983.
7. Constable, C.G., and C.L. Johnson, Anisotropic paleosecular variation models: Implications for geomagnetic field observables, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 115, 35-51, 1999.
8. Dankers, P.H., and J.D.A. Zijderveld, Alternating field demagnetization and the problem of gyro-magnetic remanence, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 53, 89-92, 1981.
9. Dunlop, D.J., Viscous magnetization of 0.04-100 μm magnetites, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 74, 667-687, 1983.
10. Edwards, J., Gyroremanent magnetization produced by specimen rotation between successive alternating field treatments, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 71, 199-214, 1982.
11. Efron, B., and R. Tibshirani, Boostrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy, Stat. Sci., 1, 54-77, 1986.
12. Goslin, J., M. Recq, and R. Schlich, Emplacement and evolution of the Madagascar ridge and Crozet submarine plateau, Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr., 7, 609-618, 1981.
13. Gunn, B.M., E.C. Abranson, N.D. Watkins, and J. Nougier, Petrology and geochemistry of Iles Crozet: a summary, in Antarctic Geology and Geophysics, edited by R.J. Adie, pp 825-829, Univ. forlaget Oslo, 1972.
14. Kirschvink, J.L., The least-squares line and plane and the analysis of paleomagnetic data, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 62, 699-718, 1980.
15. Laj, C., A. Mazaud, R. Weeks, M. Fuller, and E. Herrero-Bervera, Geomagnetic reversal paths, Nature, 341, 447, 1991.
16. Love, J.J., Paleomagnetic volcanic data and geometric regularity of reversals and excursions, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 12,435-12,452, 1998.
17. Love, J.J., Statistical assessment of preferred transitional VGP longitudes based on paleomagnetic volcanic data, Geophys. J. Int., 140, 1, 211-221, 2000.
18. McElhinny, M.W., and P.L. McFadden, Palaeosecular variation over the past 5 Myr based on a new generalized database, Geophys. J. Int., 131, 240-252, 1997.
19. Merrill, R.T., M.W. McElhinny, and P.L. McFadden, The magnetic field of the Earth: Paleomagnetism, the core, and the deep mantle, Int. Geophys. Ser., vol. 63, edited by R. Dmowska and J.R. Holton, 538 p, Academic press, San Diego, Calif., 1996.
20. Prévot, M., Some aspects of magnetic viscosity on subaerial and submarine volcanic rocks, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 66, 169-192, 1981.
21. Prévot, M., and P. Camps, Absence of preferred longitude sectors for poles from volcanic records of geomagnetic reversals, Nature, 366, 53-57, 1993.
22. Roperch, P., and G.K. Taylor, The importance of gyromagnetic remanence in alternating field demagnetization. Some new data and experiments on G.R.M. and R.R.M., Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 87, 949-965, 1986.
23. Stephenson, A., Gyroremanent magnetization in anisotropic magnetic material, Nature, 284, 49, 1980.
24. Thellier, E., and O. Thellier, Recherches géomagnétiques sur les coulées volcaniques d'Auvergne, Ann. Geophys., 1, 37-52, 1944.
25. Watkins, N.D., A. Hajash, and C.E. Abranson, Geomagnetic secular variation during the Brunhes epoch in the Indian and Atlantic Ocean regions, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 28, 1-25, 1972.
26. Watkins, N.D., and J. Nougier, Excursions and secular variations of the Brunhes epoch geomagnetic field in the Indian Ocean region, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 6060-6068, 1973.
27. Watkins, N.D., B.M. Gunn, J. Nougier, and A.K. Baksi, Kerguelen continental fragment or oceanic island?, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 85, 201-212, 1974.
28. Watkins, N.D., I. McDougall, and J. Nougier, Paleomagnetism and potassium-argon age of St. Paul Island, South Eastern Indian Ocean: Contrasts in geomagnetic secular variation during the Brunhes epoch, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 24, 377-384, 1975.