What difference do polarisation measures make? An application to China

Journal of Development Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 85-98

  Zhang, X ^a   Kanbur, R ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INCOME DISTRIBUTION; POLARIZATION; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS;

CHINA;

EID: 0035070880     PISSN: 00220388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220380412331321981     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Regional income inequality and economic growth in China
2. On the measurement of polarisation
3. Control the development gap between the seaboard and the interior; Accelerate the development of Central and Western Regions
4. Are there dynamic gains from a poor-area development program
5. Trends in regional inequalities in China
6. Which regional inequality? The evolution of rural-urban and Inland-Coastal inequality in China, 1983-1995
7. Has China become polarized
8. Interprovincial disparities in China: Output and consumption, 1952-1987
9. What can new survey data tell us about recent changes in distribution and poverty
10. The class of additively decomposable inequality measures
11. Inequality decomposition by population subgroup
12. Transfer sensitive inequality measures
13. China's regional inequality, 1952-1985
14. Decomposition of China's regional inequalities
15. Economic reform and interprovincial inequalities in China
16. Industrialization and spatial income inequality in Rural China, 1986-92
17. When inequalities diverge