|
Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 286-288
|
A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy
a a a a a |
Author keywords
Cost benefit analysis; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Supracervical hysterectomy; Vaginal surgery
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
LENGTH OF STAY;
LYMPHADENECTOMY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MORBIDITY;
OPERATION DURATION;
PARITY;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PREGNANCY;
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
UTERUS WEIGHT;
VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;
CASE-CONTROL STUDIES;
COHORT STUDIES;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE COSTS;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMANS;
HYSTERECTOMY;
HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL;
LAPAROSCOPY;
LEIOMYOMA;
LENGTH OF STAY;
PELVIC PAIN;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UTERINE HEMORRHAGE;
|
EID: 0035066912
PISSN: 09302794
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s004640000328 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (59)
|
References (14)
|