|
|
Volumn 215, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 85-94
|
|
A comparison between automatically generated linear and parabolic tetrahedra when used to mesh a human femur
|
|
Author keywords
Finite element modelling; Human femur; Linear and parabolic tetrahedron; Mesh refinement
|
|
Indexed keywords
BONE;
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;
FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;
ORTHOPEDICS;
ALGORITHMS;
COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS;
COMPUTER GRAPHICS;
GEOMETRY;
ITERATIVE METHODS;
MESH GENERATION;
PROGRAM PROCESSORS;
HUMAN FEMUR;
BIOMECHANICS;
FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;
AUTOMATIC MESH GENERATION;
AUTOMATIC MESH GENERATORS;
COMPUTER AIDED ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY;
FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING;
HUMAN FEMORA;
LINEAR AND PARABOLIC TETRAHEDRON;
LINEAR TETRAHEDRAL ELEMENTS;
MESH REFINEMENT;
ALGORITHM;
ARTICLE;
AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT;
BIOMECHANICS;
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;
BIOMETRY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
COMPUTER SIMULATION;
EVALUATION;
FEMUR;
HISTOLOGY;
HUMAN;
IMAGE PROCESSING;
METHODOLOGY;
PHYSIOLOGY;
RADIOGRAPHY;
STATISTICS;
ALGORITHMS;
BIOMECHANICS;
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;
BIOMETRY;
COMPUTER SIMULATION;
EVALUATION STUDIES;
FEMUR;
HUMANS;
IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
MODELS, ANATOMIC;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
|
EID: 0035065697
PISSN: 09544119
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1243/0954411011533562 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (47)
|
|
References (16)
|
