Undergraduate and postgraduate students' responses to mandatory courses (FELASA category C) in laboratory animal science

Laboratory Animals

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 188-193

  Carlsson, H E ^a   Hagelin, J ^a   Hoglund A U ^a   Hau, J ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Course evaluation; Education; Laboratory animal science

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COLLEGE STUDENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LABORATORY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN; THEORETICAL STUDY; UNIVERSITY;

ADULT; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, GRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE; MALE; STUDENTS; SWEDEN;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0035065033     PISSN: 00236772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/0023677011911462     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. The role of education in understanding the use of animals in research
2. Training graduate students in the use and care of animals
3. Undergraduate university students' views on the use of animals in biomedical research
4. The importance of student training in experimental procedures on animals in education
5. Attitude of Swedish veterinary and medical students to animal experimentation
6. Humane endpoints and the importance of training
7. Forum: Dissection: The case for
8. Animals in the classroom: Considering the options
9. Current uses oflaboratory animals in Japan and alternative methods in research, testing and education
10. The importance of dissection in biology teaching
11. Veterinarians and the use of laboratory animals
12. FELASA recommendations on the education and training of persons working with laboratory animals: Category A and category C
13. Education and animal experimentation