Natural versus manufactured capital: Win - lose or win - win? A case study of the Finnish pulp and paper industry

Ecological Economics

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 71-85

  Karvonen, M M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Capital substitution; Policy; Pulp and paper industry; Win win

Indexed keywords

CAPITAL FLOW; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY; SUSTAINABILITY;

FINLAND;

EID: 0035061126     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00265-2     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment
2. The Kuznets curve and the life cycle analogy
3. The impact of environmental regulation on industry productivity: Direct and indirect effects
4. Environmental policy and policy instruments
5. Environmental regulation and profitability: An application to Swedish pulp and paper mills
6. New economic theories - Impact on environmental economics
7. The contribution of environmental regulations to the slowdown in productivity growth
8. Indicators of dematerialisation and the materials intensity of use
9. Energy and the United States economy: A biophysical perspective
10. Toward an ecological economics
11. Natural capital and sustainable development
12. Equipment investment and economic growth
13. The challenge of going green
14. Industrial ecology and competitiveness: Strategic implications for the firm
15. Environmental regulations and productivity growth: The case of fossil-fueled electric generation
16. Does it pay to be green? An empirical estimation of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance
17. Materials flows vs 'natural capital' - What makes an economy sustainable?
18. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us?
19. Environmental regulation and U.S. economic growth
20. Capital accumulation and economic growth
21. A biophysical analysis of the energy/real GDP ratio: Implications for substitution and technical change
22. The eonomic multiplier of environmental life support: Can capital substitute for a degraded environment?
23. Economic growth and income inequality
24. Maintainability of first mover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries
25. Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: An indicator of weak sustainability
26. Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs
27. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship
28. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate
29. The factor x debate: Setting targets for eco-efficiency
30. How to account for environmental degradation
31. Has environmental protection really reduced productivity growth?
32. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organising framework
33. Dynamics of material and energy use in U.S. pulp and paper manufacturing
34. Impacts of market-based climate change policies on the US pulp and paper industry
35. The environment as capital
36. Reply: Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz
37. Reply: Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz
38. Neoclassical economic growth theory and "sustainability"
39. Indicators of sustainable development: Some lessons from capital theory
40. It's not easy being green
41. Economic development and environmental pollution: Traps and growth
42. Environmental policy and competitiveness: The Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital