Anastomotic protection and preservation of continence in the surgical therapy of rectal cancer;Anastomosenprotektion und kontinenzerhaltung in der chirurgischen therapie des rektumkarzinoms

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie

Volumn 126, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 307-311

  Koperna, T ^a   Reiner, G ^a  

^a Krankenhaus Mistelbach   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abdomino perineal resection; Defunctioning stoma; Hartmann resection; Low anterior resection; Rectal cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; COLOSTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLOSTOMY; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0035049115     PISSN: 0044409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-14736     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Total mesenteric excision in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. A prospective study
2. Complications of stapled anastomoses in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: Colorectal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis
3. Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis
4. The utility of the Hartmann procedure
5. Methods to decrease the morbidity of abdominoperineal resection
6. Defunctioning colostomy for low anterior resection: A selective approach
7. Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument. A randomized study
8. Evaluation of a policy of total mesorectal excision for rectal and rectosigmoid cancers
9. Hartmann's procedure vs. abdominoperineal resection for palliation of advanced low rectal cancer
10. Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer
11. Colonic pouch vs. Side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection
12. Extraperitonealization of the anastomosis and sacral drain in restorative surgery for rectal carcinoma: A safety mechanism in the absence of a covering stoma
13. Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis
14. Chances of cure are not compromised with sphincter-saving procedures for cancer of the lower third of the rectum
15. Long-term results of anterior resection using the double-stapling technique
16. Prospective audit following the introduction of short-course preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer
17. Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer
18. Anterior resection without a defunctioning colostomy: Questions of safety
19. Influence of temporary faecal diversion on long-term survival after curative surgery for colorectal cancer
20. Population-based audit of colorectal cancer management in two UK health regions
21. Stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery: A prospective study
22. Sphincter preservation therapy for distal rectal carcinoma
23. Arandomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses
24. The true cost of protective loop colostomy
25. Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision
26. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer
27. Ist die protektive Colostomie bei linksseitigen Resektionen am Colo-Rectum notwendig?
28. Die vordere Rektumresektion
29. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer
30. Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer
31. Colostomy vs. tube cecostomy for protection of a low anastomosis in rectal cancer
32. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum