|
|
|
Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 53-55
|
|
Should we use video-assisted endoscopic vein harvesting as a standard technique?
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTERY GRAFT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT;
COST;
DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT;
EDEMA;
ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY;
EQUIPMENT;
FEMALE;
HEMATOMA;
HUMAN;
KNEE;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
OPERATION DURATION;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SKIN INCISION;
STANDARD;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
SURGICAL WOUND;
VEIN DIAMETER;
VEIN GRAFT;
WOUND CLOSURE;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
FEASIBILITY STUDIES;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SAPHENOUS VEIN;
TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING;
VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY;
|
|
EID: 0035046669
PISSN: 10983511
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (13)
|
|
References (8)
|
