A longitudinal study of environmental attitudes of women and gender diversification in the U.S. Forest Service 1990-1996

Forest Science

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 246-257

  Brown, Greg ^a   Harris, Charles C ^b  

^a ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Affirmative action; Environmental attitudes; Organizational change; Workforce diversification

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PERSONNEL; TIMBER;

GENDER DIVERSIFICATION;

FORESTRY;

EID: 0035041356     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. ACKER, J. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender Soc. 4(2): 139-158.
2. ARCURY, T.A., S.J. SCOLLAY, AND T.P. JOHNSON. 1987. Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge: The case of acid rain. Sex Roles 16:463-472.
3. BLOCKNER, T.J., AND D.L. ECKBERG. 1989. Environmental issues as women's issues: General concerns and local hazards. Soc. Sci. Quart. 70:586-593.
4. BRITTON, D.M. 1997. Gendered organizational logic: Policy and practice in men's and women's prisons. Gender Soc. 11(6):798-820.
5. BROWN, G., AND C.C. HARRIS. 1992a. The U.S. Forest Service: Toward the new resource management paradigm? Soc. Natur. Resour. 5:231-245.
6. BROWN, G., AND C.C. HARRIS. 1992b. The U.S. Forest Service: Changing of the guard. Natur. Resour. J. 32:459-466.
7. BROWN, G., AND C.C. HARRIS. 1993. The implications of work force diversification in the U.S. Forest Service. Admin. Soc. 25:85-113.
8. BROWN, G., AND C.C. HARRIS. 1998. Professional foresters and the land ethic, revisited. J. For. 96(1):4-12.
9. BROWN, G., AND C.C. HARRIS. 2000. The U.S. Forest Service: Whither the new resource management paradigm? J. Environ. Manage. 58:1-19.
10. CARROLL, F.O., J. FREEMUTH, AND L. ALM. 1996. Women forest rangers: Revisiting Kaufman's The Forest Ranger. J. For. 94:38-41.
11. DILLMAN, D.A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys. Wiley, New York.
12. FARNHAM, T. 1995. Forest Service budget requests and appropriations: What do analyses of trends reveal? Pol. Studi. J. 23:253-267.
13. FARNHAM, T., AND P. MOHAI. 1995. National forest timber management over the past decade: A change in emphasis for the Forest Service? Pol. Stud. J. 23:268-280.
14. FARNHAM, T., C.P. TAYLOR, AND W. GALLAWAY. 1995. A shift in values: Non-commodity resource management and the Forest Service. Pol. Stud. J. 23:281-293.
15. JONES, E.S., AND C.P. TAYLOR. 1995. Litigating agency change: The impact of the courts and administrative appeals process on the Forest Service. Pol. Stud. J. 23:310-336.
16. JONES, E.S., AND P. MOHAI. 1995. Is the Forest Service keeping up with the times: Interest group and forestry school perceptions of post-NFMA change in the United States Forest Service. Pol. Stud. J. 23:351-371.
17. KENNEDY, J.J., AND J.A. MINCOLLA. 1986. Women and men natural resource managers in early stages of their professional Forest Service careers. Wom. For. 8:23-28.
18. KENNEDY, J.J., AND T.M.QUIGLEY. 1989. Conference summary: How entry-level employees, Forest Supervisors, Regional Foresters and Chiefs view Forest Service values and the reward system. (Unpublished results of survey done for the Sunbird Conf., the second meeting of the forest supervisors and chief held in Tucson, AZ, Nov. 13-16, 1989).
19. KENNEDY, J.J. 1991. Integrating gender diverse and interdisciplinary professionals into traditional U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service culture. Soc. Natur. Resour. 4:165-176.
20. KENNEDY, J.J., R.S. KRANNICH, T.M. QUIGLEY, AND L.A. CRAMER. 1993. Employee perceptions of USDA Forest Service values and the agency reward system. Paper presented at the 1993 Soc. Am. For. Annual Convention. Soc. Am. For., Bethesda, MD.
21. LOWE, G.D., T.K. PINHEY, AND M.D. GRIMES. 1980. Public support for environmental protection: New evidence from national surveys. Pac. Sociol. Rev. 23:423-445.
22. MCSTAY, J.R., AND R.E. DUNLAP. 1983. Male-female differences in concern for environmental quality. Internat. J. Wom. Stud. 6:291-301.
23. MOHAI, P., P. STILLMAN, P. JAKES, AND C. LIGGETT. 1994. Change in the USDA Forest Service: Are we heading in the right direction? USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-172.
24. MOHAI, P. 1992. Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Soc. Natur. Resour. 5:1-19.
25. STEEH, C., AND M. KRYSAN. 1996. The polls - trends: Affirmative action and the public, 1970-1995. Publ. Opin. Quart. 60:128-158.
26. STEGER, M.E., AND S.L. WITT. 1989. Gender differences in environmental orientations: A comparison of publics and activists in Canada and the U.S. West. Polit. Quart. 42:627-649.
27. THOMAS, J.C., AND P. MOHAI. 1995. Racial, gender, and professional diversification in the Forest Service from 1982 to 1992. Pol. Stud. J. 23:296-309.
28. TOGNACCI, L.N., R.H. WEIGEL, M.F. WIDEEN, AND D.T.A. VERNON. 1972. Environmental quality: How universal is public concern? Environ. Behav. 4:73-86.
29. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. USDA Civil Rights Action Team. 1997. Civil Rights at the United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC.
30. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE. 1994. Personnel Management Staff. Work Force Data Book 1992-93. Washington, DC.
31. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE. 1990. Personnel and Civil Rights Staff. Work Force Data Book 1989-1990.
32. WINOKUR, D.K. 1986. History and summary of consent decree: USDA Forest Service. Women in Forestry 8:66-68.