메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 105-122

Observers, advisers, or authorities? Experts, juries and criminal responsibility in historical perspective

Author keywords

Diminished responsibility; Expert evidence; History; Insanity defence

Indexed keywords

AUTHORITY; CRIMINOLOGY; EXPERT WITNESS; FORENSIC SCIENCE; HISTORY; HUMAN RELATION; JURISPRUDENCE; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NOTE; OBSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0035041259     PISSN: 09585184     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585180010028418     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (14)

References (42)
  • 7
    • 0033475109 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lesion of the will: Medical resolve and criminal responsibility in Victorian insanity trials
    • (1999) Law & Society Review , vol.33 , Issue.2 , pp. 425-459
    • Eigen, J.P.1
  • 36
    • 0005014533 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Psychiatry and criminal responsibility in England, 1843-1939
    • PhD thesis, De Montfort University, Leicester, 1996
    • (1996)
    • Ward, T.1
  • 37
    • 0031489626 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Law, common sense and the authority of science: Expert witnesses and criminal insanity in England, Ca. 1840-1940
    • (1997) Social & Legal Studies , vol.6 , Issue.3 , pp. 343-362
    • Ward, T.1
  • 40
    • 85020083983 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Judges v. jurors: Courtroom tensions in murder trials and the law of criminal responsibility in nineteenth-century England
    • (1999) Law and History Review , vol.17 , Issue.3 , pp. 467-506
    • Wiener, M.J.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.