Alternative use of space strategies of female roe deer (capreolus capreolus) in a mountainous habitat

Italian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 69-73

  Lamberti, Paolo ^a   Rossi, Iva ^a   Mauri, Lorenza ^a   Apollonio, Marco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASSARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Capreolus capreolus; Forest habitat; Home range; Radio tracking; Use of space strategies

Indexed keywords

DEER; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; HABITAT USE; HOME RANGE; SPACING;

ITALY;

EID: 0035030054     PISSN: 11250003     EISSN: 17485851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11250000109356385     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aaenes, R., and Andersen, R., 1996. The effects of sex, time of birth, and habitat on the vulnerability of roe deer fawns to red fox predation. Can. J. Zool., 74:1857–1865.
2. Albon, S. D., and Langvatn, R., 1992. Plant phenology and the benefits of migration in a temperate ungulate. Oikos, 65:502–513.
3. Bideau, E., Vincent, J. P., Gerard, J. F., and Maublanc, M. L., 1993. Influence of age and sex on space occupation by European roe deer. J. Mammal., 74:745–751.
4. Cederlund, G., 1983. Home range dynamics and habitat selection by roe deer in a boreal area in central Sweden. Acta Theriol., 28:443–460.
5. Chapman, N. G., Claydon, K., Claydon, M., Forde, P., and Harris, S., 1993. Sympatric populations of muntjac (Muntiacus reevesí) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus):a comparative analysis of their ranging behaviour, social organization and activity. J. Zool. (Lond.), 229:623–640.
6. Cibien, C., and Sempéré, A., 1989. Food availability as a factor in habitat use by roe deer. Acta Theriol., 34:111–123.
7. Danilkin, A., and Hewison, A. J., 1996. Behavioural ecology of Siberian and European roe deer, 227London:Chapman & Hall.
8. Fruzinski, B., Labudzki, L., and Wlazelko, M., 1983. Habitat, density and spatial structure of the forest roe deer population. Acta Theriol., 28:243–258.
9. Harestad, A. S., and Bunnell, F. L., 1979. Home range and body weight, a revaluation. Ecology, 60:389–402.
10. Harris, S., Cresswell, W. J., Forde, P., Trewhella, W. J., Woolard, T., and Wray, S., 1990. Home range analysis using radio-tracking data, a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Rev., 20:97–123.
11. Heezen, K. L., and Tester, J. R., 1967. Evaluation of radio-tracking by triangulation with special reference to deer movements. J. Wildl. Manage., 31:124–141.
12. Hewison, A. J., Vincent, J. P., Angibault, J. M., Delorme, D., Van Laere, G., and Gaillard, J. M., 1999. Tests of estimation of age from tooth wear on roe deer of known age:variation within and among populations. Can. J. Zool., 77:58–67.
13. Kenward, R., 1987. Wildlife radio tagging, 222London:Academic Press.
14. Linnell, J. D. C., Duncan, P., and Andersen, R., 1998. “ The European roe deer:A portrait of a successful species ”. In The european roe deer:the biology of success, Edited by:Andersen, R., Duncan, P., and Linnell, J. D. C., 11–22. Oslo:Scandinavian University Press.
15. Mattioli, L., Apollonio, M., Mazzarone, V., and Centofanti, E., 1995. Wolf food habits and wild ungulate availability in the Foreste Casentinesi National Park, Italy. Acta Theriol., 40:387–402.
16. Mattioli, L., Lovari, C., Mazzarone, V., Pedone, P., and Siemoni, N., 1991. Ecological aspects of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) population of the Foreste Casentinesi National Park. Ongulés/Ungulates, 91:527–530.
17. McNab, B., 1963. Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. Am. Nat., 97:133–140.
18. Mohr, C. O., 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North America small mammals. J. Midl. Nat., 37:223–249.
19. Mysterud, A., 1999. Seasonal migration pattern and home range of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in an altitudinal gradient in southern Norway. J. Zool. (Lond.), 247:479–486.
20. San José, C., and Lovari, S., 1998. Ranging movements of female roe deer:do home-loving does roam to mate?. Ethology, 104:721–728.
21. Staines, B. W., 1974. A review of factors affecting deer dispersion and relevance to management. Mammal Rev., 4:79–91.
22. Strandgaard, H., 1972. The roe deer population at Kalø and the factors regulating its size. Dan. Rev. Game Biol., 7:1–205.
23. Tufto, J., Andersen, R., and Linnell, J., 1996. Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid:the roe deer. J. anim. Ecol., 65:715–724.
24. Van Winkle, W., 1975. Comparison of several probablistic home range models. J. Wildl. Manage., 39:118–123.
25. Vincent, J. P., Bideau, E., Hewinson, A. J. M., and Angibault, J. M., 1995. The influence of increasing density on body weight, kid production, home range and winter grouping in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). J. Zool. (Lond.), 236:371–382.
26. Wahlström, L. K., and Liberg, O., 1995. Patterns of dispersal and seasonal migration in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). J. Zool. (Lond.), 235:455–467.
27. Worton, B. J., 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home range studies. Ecology, 70:164–168.