A technique for presenting risk and outcome data to potential living renal transplant donors

Transplantation

Volumn 71, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 1056-1057

  Steiner, Robert W ^a   Gert, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COUNSELING; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONOR; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0035026061     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200104270-00007     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Cecka JM. The UNOS Scientific Transplant Registry. In: Cecka JM, Terasaki PI, eds. Clinical Transplants, 1996. Los Angeles: UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, 1996: 3.
2. Wolfe RA, Port FK, Webb RL, et al. Excerpts from United States Renal Data System 1998 Annual Data Report: Incidence and Prevalence of ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32 (2 suppl 1): S38.
3. Kasiske BL, Bia MJ. The Evaluation and selection of living kidney donors. Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 26: 2 387.
4. Lindeman RD, Tobin JD, Shock NW. Association between blood pressure and the rate of decline in renal function with age. Kidney Int 1984; 25: 861.
5. Lopes AAS, Port FK. Differences in the patterns of age-specific black/white comparisons between end stage renal disease attributed and not attributed to diabetes. Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 25: 5, 714.
6. Hsien-Hsien L, Perneger TV, Klag MJ, et al. Familial aggregation of renal disease in a population-based case-control study. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998; 9: 1270.
7. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981; 211: 453.