Designing components versus objects: A transformational approach

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn 2001-May, Issue , 2001, Pages 253-262

  Lorenz, David H ^a   Vlissides, John ^b  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Component based design; Component based software engineering; JavaBeans; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

COMPONENT ARCHITECTURES; COMPONENT BASED DESIGN; COMPONENT-BASED PROGRAMMING; COMPONENT-BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; DESIGN SPACES; DESIGNING COMPONENTS; JAVA BEANS; OBJECT-ORIENTED DESIGN; TRANSFORMATIONAL APPROACH; COMPONENT BASED PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CLASSIFICATION; JAVABEANS; TAXONOMY;

TAXONOMIES; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0035018645     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSE.2001.919099     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. E Budinsky, M. Fmie, J. Vlissides, and P. Yu. Automatic code generation from design patterns. IBM SystemsJournal, 35(2):151-171, 1996.
2. D.D'Souza. UML panel in OOPSLA'99.
3. D. F. D'Souza and A. C. Wills. Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML:The CatalysisApproach. Object Technology.Addison-Wesley, 1998.
4. D. Garlan and D. Notkin. Formalizing design spaces:Implicit invocation mechanisms. In LNCS 551, 31-44, Springer-Verlag, 1991.
5. A. Goldberg and D. Robson. Smalltalk-80: The Language and its Implementation. Addison-Wesley, 1983.
6. L. Howard. Components and connectors are the assembly language of architectural description: compositions deserve first-class status (and better abstractionmechanisms). In JointProceedings of the Second International SoftwareArchitecture Workshop (ISAW-2)and lntemational Workshopon MultiplePerspectivesin SoftwareDevelopment (Vkupoints '96)on SlGSOFT '96Workshops, pages 4446, 1996.
7. W. L. Hursch. Should superclassesbe abstract? In M. Tokoro and R. Pareschi, editors, Proceedings of the gth European Conferenceon Object-Oriented Programming, number 821 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 12-31, Bologna, Italy, July4-8 1994.ECOOP'94, Springer Verlag.
8. M. Johnson. BeanLint: A JavaBeans troubleshooting tool, part 1. JavaWorld, 3(12), Dec. 1998.
9. M. Johnson. BeanLint: A JavaBeanstroubleshooting tool, part 2. JavaWorld, 4(1), Jan. 1999.
10. H. E Li and W. K. Cheung. An empirical study of software metrics. IEEE Transactionson Software Engineering, 13(6):697-708, June 1987.
11. D. H. Lorenz. Visitor Beans: An aspect-oriented pattem. In S. Demeyer and J. Bosch, editors, Object-Oriented Technology. ECOOP'98 Workshop Reader, number 1543 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 431432. AOP Workshop Proceedings, Brussels, Belgium, Springer Verlag, July20-24 1998.
12. D. H. Lorenz and J. Vlissides. Automated architectural transformation: Objects to components. Technical Report NU-CCS-00-01, College of Computer Science, Northeastem University, Boston, MA 02115, Apr. 2000.
13. N. Medvidovic and R. N. Taylor. A framework for classifying and comparing architecture description languages. In Proceedings of the 6th European conference held jointly with the 5th ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Software engineering, pages 60-76, Zurich, Switzerland, Sept. 22-25 1997.
14. N. R. Mehta, N. Medvidovic, and S. Phadke. Towards a taxonomy of software connectors. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conferenceon SoftwareEngineering, pages 178-187, Limerick, Ireland, June4-11 2000.
15. M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software Architecture, Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice-Hall, 1996.
16. C. Szyperski. Component-Oriented Software, Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley, 1997.