Fetal shoulder measurements by fast and ultrafast MRI techniques

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 938-942

  Tukeva, Timo A ^a   Salmi, Hanna ^a   Poutanen, Veli Pekka ^a   Karjalainen, Pertti T ^a   Hytinantti, Timo ^b   Paavonen, Jorma ^a   Teramo, Kari A ^a   Aronen, Hannu J ^a,c  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Fetus; Macrosomia; Magnetic resonance; Shoulder width

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FETUS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MACROSOMIA; MATERNAL DIABETES MELLITUS; NEWBORN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHOULDER; TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFANT, NEWBORN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIMETRY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SHOULDER;

EID: 0035018268     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1134     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beall MH, C. S, McKay J, Ross MG. Objective definition of shoulder dystocia: a prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179: 934-937.
2. Cohen B, Penning S, Major C, Ansley D, Porto M, Garite T. Sonographic prediction of shoulder dystocia in infants of diabetic mothers. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:10-13.
3. Conway DL, Langer O. Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased caeserean sections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:922-925.
4. Verspyk E, Goffinet F, Hellot MF, Milliez J, Marpeau L. Newborn shoulder width: a prospective study of 2222 consecutive measurements. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1999;106:589-593.
5. Klaij FAV, Geirsson RT, Nielsen H, Hreinsdottir M, Haraldsdottir KR. Humerospinous distance measurements: accuracy and usefulness for predicting shoulder dystocia in delivery at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:115-119.
6. Riska A, Laine H, P. V, Kariniemi V. Estimation of fetal shoulder width by measurement of the humerospinous distance by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7:272-274.
7. Poutamo J. Partanen K, Vanninen R, Vainio P, Kirkinen P. MRI does not change fetal cardiotocographic parameters. Prenatal Diagnosis 1998;18:1149-1154.
8. Kastler B, Gangi A, Mathelin C, Germain P, Arhain J-M, Treisser A, Dietemann JL, Wackenheim A. Fetal shoulder measurements with MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:777-780.
9. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:32-33.
10. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Gowland PA, Hykin J, Harvey PR, Freeman A, Adams V, Worthington BS, Mansfield P. Fetal weight estimation by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1994;343: 644-645.
11. Levine D, Hatabu H, Gaa J, Atkinson MW, Edelman RR. Fetal anatomy revealed with fast MR sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:905-908.
12. Thomas SM, Bees NR, Adam EJ. Trends in the use of pelvimetry techniques. Clin Radiol 1998;53:293-295.
13. Chien D, Laub G, Gaa J, Edelman RR. Non-echo-planar fast MR imaging techniques. Magnetom Flash 1999;6:10-15.
14. Outwater EK. Ultrafast MR imaging of the pelvis. Eur J Radiol 1999;29:233-244.
15. Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Abe Y, Takahashi M, Iwamasa J, Miyazaki K, Okamura H. MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:513-519.
16. Schwartz R, Gruppuso PA, Petzold K, Brambilla D, Hiilesmaa V, Teramo KA. Hyperinsulinemia and macrosomia in the fetus of the diabetic mother. Diabetes Care 1994;17:640-648.
17. Tukeva TA, Aronen HJ, Karjalainen PT, Mäkelä P. Low-field MRI pelvimetry. Eur Radiol 1997;7:230-234.
18. Spörri S, Hänggi W, Braghetti A, Vock P, Schneider H. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:902-908.
19. Wright AR, English PT, Cameron HM, Wilsdon JB. MR pelvimetry - a practical alternative. Acta Radiol 1992;33:582-587.