Three-dimensional biomechanical investigation of a new lumbar artificial disc;Dreidimensionale biomechanische untersuchung eines neuen flexiblen lumbalen bandscheibenimplantats

Orthopade

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 323-327

  Zollner J ^a   Heine, J ^a   Eysel, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial disc; Biomechanics; Nucleotomy; Nucleus pulposus

Indexed keywords

POLYMETHYLSILOXANE; SILOXANE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MATERIALS; MATERIALS TESTING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CATTLE; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SILICONES;

EID: 0035017214     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001320050615     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andrews DW, Lavyne MH (1990) Retrospective analysis of microsurgical and standard lumbar discectomy. Spine 15: 329-335
2. Balderston RA, Gilyard GG, Jones AAM, Wiesel SW, Spengler DM, Bigos STJ, Rothmann RH (1991) The treatment of lumbar disc herniation: simple fragment excision versus disc space curretage. J Spinal Disorders 4: 22-25
3. Buettner-Janz K, Schellnack K, Zippel H (1989) Biomechanics of the SB Charite 6 lumbar intervertebral disc endoprothesis. Int Orthop (SICOT) 13: 173-176
4. Brinckmann P, Grootenboer H (1991) Change of the disc height, radial disc bulge and intradiscal pressure due to discectomy. An in vitro investigation on human lumbar discs. Spine 16: 641-646
5. Castro WHM, Jerosch J, Brinckmann P (1992) Veränderungen der lumbalen Bandscheibe nach Anwendung der nicht-automatischen perkutanen Diskotomie.Eine biomechanische Untersuchung. Z Orthop 130: 472-478
6. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F (1996) Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21: 995-1000
7. Dvorak J, Gauchat MH, Valach L (1988) The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A 4-17 years' follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects. Spine 13: 1418-1422
8. Fernstrom U (1966) Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and painful disc Acta Chir Scand 355: 154-159
9. Fritsch E, Heisel J, Rupp S (1996) The failed back surgery syndrome. Reasons, intraoperative findings and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments.Spine 21: 626-633
10. GowerWE, Pedrini V (1996) Age-related variations in protein-polysaccharidesfrom human nucleus pulposus, anulus fibrosus, and costal cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51: 1154-1160
11. Grob D, Scheier H (1987) Reinterventionen bei postoperativer Instabilität an der Lendenwirbelsäule.Orthopäde 16: 348-356
12. Hedtmann A (1992) Das sog. Postdiskotomiesyndrom - Fehlschläge der Bandscheibenoperation. Z Orthop 130: 456-466
13. Jerosch J, Castro WH (1996) Langzeitergebnisse von Reoperationen nach lumbalen Nukleotomien. Z Orthop 134: 89-96
14. Krämer J (1987) Das Postdiskotomiesyndrom -PDS. Z Orthop 125: 622-625
15. Krismer M, Raid C, Rabl W (1996) The contribution of anulus fibers to torque resistance. Spine 21: 2551-2557
16. Lagarrigue J, Chaynes P (1994) Comparative study of disk surgery with or without microscopy. A prospective study of 80 cases. Neurochirurgie 40: 116-120
17. Lavaste F, Asselineau A, Diop A, Grandjean JL, LaurainJM, Skalli W, Roy-Camille R (1990) Experimental procedure for mechanical evaluation of dorso-lumbar segments and osteosynthesis devices. Rachis 6: 435-446
18. Marchand F, Ahmed AM (1990) Investigation of the laminate structure of lumbar disc anulus fibrosus. Spine 15: 402-410
19. Nachemson A (1962) Some mechanical properties of the lumbar intervertebral discs. Bull Hosp JT Dis (NY) 23: 130-132
20. Oegema TR (1993) Biochemistry of the intervertebral disc. Clin Sport Med 12: 419-439
21. Panjabi MM, Kunioshi A, Duranceau J, Criso JJ (1988) Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: Stability provided by eight internal fixation devises. Spine 13: 1135-1142
22. Postacchini F (1996) Results of surgery compared with conservative managment for lumbar disc herniations. Spine 21: 1383-1387
23. Ray CD (1992) The artificial disc. Intruduction, history, and socioeconomics. In: Weinstein JN (ed) Clinical efficiacy and outcome in the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Raven Press, New York, pp 205-225
24. Ray CD, Schoenmayr R (1998) Two year follow up on PDN device disc replacement patients. 13th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society, San Francisco, 28.-31.10 1998
25. Seelig W, Nidecker A (1989) Schmerzen nach Operationen an der Lendenwirbelsäule. Das, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome" (FBSS). Z Orthop 127:346-353
26. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanies of the spine, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia London
27. Wilke HJ, Krischak ST, Wenger KH, Claes LE (1997) Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data. Eur Spine J 6:129-137
28. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of presures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24:755-762
29. Woersdoerfer O, Magerl F, Schlaefer F, Perren SM (1983) Vergleichende Untersuchung verschiedener Fixationssysteme der lumbalen Wirbelsäule. In: Hackenbrock MH, Refior HJ, Jaeger M (Hrsg) Biomechanik der Wirbelsäule. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, S101-107
30. Zöllner J, Rosendahl T, Herbsthofer B, Humke T, Eysel P (1999) Der Einfluss verschiedener Nucleotomietechniken auf die biomechanischen Eigenschaften der Bandscheibe.Z Orthop 137:206-210
31. Zöllner J, Rompe J-D, Eysel P (2000) Die biomechanischen Eigenschaften von künstlichen Implantaten der lumbalen Bandscheibe. Z Orthop 138:1-5
32. Zöllner J, Heine J, Eysel P (2000) Der Einfluß einer Nukleotomie auf die Biomechanischen Eigenschaften des lumbalen Bewegungssegments. Zentr Neurochir 61:1-5