A formal framework of knowledge to support rational psychoactive drug selection

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 261-275

  Van Hyfte, Dirk ^a   Van Der Maas, Arnoud ^b   Tjandra Maga, Tikma ^c   De Vries Robbé, Pieter ^b  

^a Biological Psychiatry   (Netherlands)

^b Medical Informatics   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Conceptual modeling; Domain ontology; Drug knowledge base; Pharmacoinformatics; Psychoactive drug prescription

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PHYSIOLOGY;

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;

ACCURACY; AMBIGUITY; ARTICLE; DRUG CLASSIFICATION; DRUG INFORMATION; DRUG NOMENCLATURE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL EXPERT; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PHARMACOLOGY; PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0035014431     PISSN: 09333657     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0933-3657(00)00113-5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Van Hyfte DMH, De Vries Robbé PF, Tjandra-Maga TB, Van Der Maas AAF, Zitman FG. Towards a more rational use of psychoactive substances in clinical practice. Pharmacopsychiatry, in press.
2. Anis A.H., Carruthers S.G., Carter A.O., Kierulf J. Variability in prescription drug utilization: issues for research. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 154(5):1996;635-640.
3. Cunningham L.A. Depression in the medically ill: choosing an antidepressant. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 55(Suppl A):1994;90-97.
4. De Vries T.P.G.M. Presenting clinical pharmacology and therapeutics: general introduction. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 35:1993;577-579.
5. Klein D.F. Clinical psychopharmacologic practice. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 50:1993;491-494.
6. Laurence DR, Bennett PN, Laurence DR, Bennett PN, editors. Clinical pharmacology. 7th ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1996.
7. Wingard LB, Brody TM, Larner J, et al. Human pharmacology. Molecular to clinical. Wolfe Publishing, St. Louis, 1996.
8. Guidelines ATC classification. WHO collaborating center for Drug Statistics Methodology, Oslo, 1990.
9. Riou C., Pouliquen B., Le Beux P. A computer-assisted drug prescription system: the model and its implementation in the ATM knowledge base. Methods Inf. Med. 38:1999;25-30.
10. Bloom F.E., Young W.G. New solutions for neuroscience communications are still needed. Prog. Brain Res. 100:1994;275-281.
11. Axer H., Niemann K. Terminology of the thalamus and its representation in a part-whole relation. Methods Inf. Med. 33(5):1994;488-495.
12. Weed L.L. New connections between medical knowledge and patient care. Br. Med. J. 315:1997;231-235.
13. Milstein C., de Zegher I., Venot A., Séné B., Pietri B., Dahlberg B. Modeling drug information for a prescription oriented knowledge base on drugs. Methods Inf. Med. 34:1995;318-327.
14. Schiff G.D., Rucker D. Computerized prescribing. Building the electronic infrastructure for better medication usage. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 279(13):1998;1024-1029.
15. Husson C, Mangeot A, Venot A, Degoulet P, editors. Informatique et médicament. Theriaque: information sur le médicament et aide à la prescription. Paris: Springer, 1989.
16. www.firstdatabank.com . National Drug Data File (NDDF), 1997.
17. Linnarsson R. Decision support for drug prescription integrated with computer-based patient records in primary care. Med. Inf. 18(2):1993;131-142.
18. Gruber T. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 43:1995;907-928.
19. Van Hyfte DMH, De Vries Robbé PF, Van Der Maas AAF, Tjandra-Maga TB, Zitman FG. A multidisciplinary framework of knowledge on psychoactive drugs. Med Hypothesis, in press.
20. Baker P.G., Goble C.A., Bechhofer S., Paton N.W., Stevens R., Brass A. An ontology for bioinformatics applications. Bioinformatics. 15(6):1999;510-520.
21. Rosse C., Mejino L., Modayur B.R., Jakobovits R., Hinshaw K.P., Brinkley J.F. Motivation and organizational principles for anatomical knowledge representation: the digital anatomist symbolic knowledge base. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5:1998;17-40.
22. Rector A.L. Thesauri and formal classifications: terminologies for people and machines. Methods Inf. Med. 37:1998;501-509.
23. Goble CA, Glowinski AJ, Nowlan WA, et al. A descriptive semantic formalism for medicine. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Data Engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1992. p. 624-32.
24. Rector AL. The Galen high level ontology. Medical informatics in Europe (MIE). Copenhagen, 1996.
25. Ball S.S., Mah V.H., Miller P.L. SENEX: a computer-based representation of cellular signal transduction processes in the central nervous system. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 7(2):1991;175-187.
26. Wagner J.C., Rogers J.E., Baud R.H., Scherrer J.R. Natural language generation of surgical procedures. Int. J. Med. Inf. 53(2/3):1999;175-192.
27. Smart J.F., Roux M. A model for medical knowledge representation application to the analysis of descriptive pathology reports. Methods Inf. Med. 34(4):1995;352-360.
28. Zweigenbaum P., Bachimont B., Bouaud J., Charlet J., Boisvieux J.F. Issues in the structuring and acquisition of an ontology for medical language understanding. Methods Inf. Med. 34:1995;15-24.
29. Barahona P. A causal and temporal reasoning model and its use in drug therapy applications. Artificial Intelligence Med. 6(1):1994;1-27.
30. Liu J.H., Milstein C., Séné B., Venot A. Object-oriented modeling and terminologies for drug contraindications. Methods Inf. Med. 37:1998;45-52.
31. Séné B., Venot A., de Zegher I., Milstein C., Errore S., de Rosis F., Strauch G. A general model of drug prescription. Methods Inf. Med. 34:1995;310-317.