A comparison of patients' responses about their disability with and without attribution to their affected area

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 580-586

  Marx, Robert G ^a,b   Hogg Johnson, Sheilah ^b   Hudak, Pam ^b   Beaton, Dorcas ^b   Shields, Susanne ^b   Bombardier, Claire ^b,c   Wright, James G ^a  

^a Clin Epidemiol Hlth Care Res P   (Canada)

^b INSTITUTE FOR WORK AND HEALTH   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Disability evaluation; Health status; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of results

Indexed keywords

ARM DISEASE; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL STATUS; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORK;

ADULT; COMORBIDITY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0035012599     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00345-0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bombardier C., Melfi C.A., Paul J., Green R., Hawker G., Wright J., Coyte P. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement. Med Care. 33:1995;AS131-AS144.
2. Patrick D.L., Deyo R.A. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 27:1989;S217-S232.
3. Guyatt G.H., Feeny D.H., Patrick D.L. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Inter Med. 118:1993;622-629.
4. Bergner M. Health status measures. an overview and guide for selection Ann Rev Public Health. 8:1987;191.
5. Wiklund I., Karlberg J. Evaluation of quality of life in clinical trials. Selecting quality-of-life measures. Controlled Clin Trials. 12:1991;204S-216S.
6. MacKenzie C.R., Charlson M.E., DiGiosa D., Kelley K. Can the sickness impact profile measure change. an example of scale assessment J Chron Dis. 39:1986;429-438.
7. MacKenzie C.R., Charlson M.E., DiGiosa D., Kelley K. A patient-specific measure of change in maximal function. Arch Inter Med. 146:1986;1325-1329.
8. Kantz M.E., Harris W.J., Levitsky K., Ware J.E., Ross-Davies A. Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement. Med Care. 30:1992;MS240-MS252.
9. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 30:1992;473-483.
10. Hudak P.L., Amadio P.C., Bombardier C.B., Beaton D., Cole D., Davis A., Hawker G., Katz J.N., Makela M., Marx R.G., Punnett L., Wright J.G. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure. the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Am J Indust Med. 29:1996;602-608.
11. Ware J.E., Snow K.K., Kosinski M., Gandek B. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. 1993;The Health Institute, Boston.
12. Rosner B. Fundamental of biostatistics. 1995;Duxbury Press, Toronto.
13. Connor R. Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design. Biometriecs 43:207-11.
14. Redelmeier D.A., Rozin P., Kahneman D. Understanding patients' decisions. Cognitive and emotional perspectives. J Am Med Assoc. 270:1993;72-76.
15. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 211:1981;453-458.
16. McNeil B.J., Pauker S.G., Sox H.C.J., Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med. 306:1982;1259-1262.
17. Redelmeir D.A., Koehler D.J., Liberman V., Tversky A. Probability judgement in medicine. discounting unspecified possibilities Med Decision Making. 15:1995;227-230.