Decision making process for compulsory admission: Study on a group of psychiatrists from Sardinia (Italy);Il processo decisionale per il trattamento sanitario obbligatorio: Studio su un campione di psichiatri della regione Sardegna (Italia)

Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 37-45

  Dazzan, P ^a   Bhugra, D ^a   Carta, M G ^a   Carpiniello, B ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; ITALY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HOSPITAL; PSYCHIATRIST; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 0035010438     PISSN: 1121189X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1121189X00008526     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. The effect of consumer's social characteristics and behaviour on psychiatric admission decisions
2. Differences among clinicians in the decision to admit
3. Decision making in psychiatric civil commitment: An Experimental Analysis
4. Variabilità delle decisioni gestionali e cliniche nei servizi di salute mentale della regione lombardia con il metodo delle vignette
5. Zwangseinweisungen psychisch kranker
6. La terapia farmacologica nei servizi psichiatrici ospedalieri. Primi risultati di un'indagine nell'area urbana di Cagliari
7. Reasons for compulsory admission
8. Schizophrenia is not (simply) a neurodevelopmental disorder
9. Il trattamento sanitario obbligatorio e l'assistenza sul territorio
10. Decision making process for compulsory admission - A survey of psychiatrists in England
11. Reform said or done? The case of Emilia-Romagna within the Italian psychiatric context
12. Inner London Collaborative Audit of Admission in Two Health Districts III: Reasons for acute admission to psychiatric wards
13. Decision to admit in an inner-city psychiatric emergency room: Beyond diagnosis, the psychosocial factors
14. Alternative all'analisi della varianza e al test t basate sui ranghi
15. Reasons for admissions to hospital
16. A comparison of voluntary and committed psychiatric patients
17. Reasons for hospitalization from a psychiatric emergency service
18. Civil commitment: A review of empirical research
19. Determinants of emergency psychiatric admission for adolescents and adults
20. Are British psychiatrists racist?
21. The reliability of psychiatric diagnosis in the emergency room
22. Involuntary commitments to public mental institutions: Issues involving the overrepresentation of blacks and assessment of relevant functioning
23. Psychiatric decision making in the emergency room: A research overview
24. Determinants of psychiatric inpatient admission to general hospital psychiatric wards: An epidemiological study in a region of central Italy
25. Determinants of the decision for psychiatric hospitalization
26. Influence of experience on major clinical decisions. Training implications
27. Admission decisions and multiaxial diagnosis
28. Emergency psychiatry: A review of the literature
29. Hospital and community based psychiatry: A comparative study between a Danish and an Italian psychiatric service
30. Correlates of commitment status in psychiatric patients
31. Psychosocial outcome of schizophrenic patients in Sardinia, Italy
32. Patients admitted for compulsory treatment to selected psychiatric units in Italy and in Sweden
33. Patients released after psychiatric committment evaluation: Comparison with the committed
34. Organizzazione, sviluppo e prospettive della assistenzapsichiatrica in Sardegna
35. Differential use of psychiatric services by West Indians, West Africans and English in London
36. Civil commitment standards and patient mix in England/Wales, Italy and the United States
37. Morbidity and mortality in the commitment process
38. Perceived ethnicity and risk of compulsory admission
39. Age and compulsory admission
40. Compulsory admissions in a London borough: I. Social and clinical features and a follow up
41. Decision-making process in the emergency room
42. Community reactions to mental disorders. A key informant study in three developing countries
43. A comparison of voluntary and involuntary patients in a state hospital