The acquisition of complex predicates in Japanese specifically language-impaired and normally developing children

Brain and Language

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 305-320

  Fukuda, Shinji ^a   Fukuda, Suzy E ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Complex predicates; Implicit procedural competence; Overregularizations; Specific language impairment (SLI); Syntax lexicon interface

Indexed keywords

CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; JAPAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LINGUISTICS; PREDICTION; THEORY;

EID: 0035006999     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.2000.2404     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amberber, M. 1996, Transitivity alternations, event-types and light verbs. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.
2. Bloom L., Lahey M. Language development and language disorders. 1978;Wiley, New York.
3. Burzio L. Italian syntax. A government-binding approach. 1986;Reidel, Dordrecht.
4. Chomsky N. The minimalist program. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge.
5. Clahsen H. Child language and developmental dysphasia. Linguistic studies of the acquisition of German. 1991;John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
6. Fukuda S. The representation of Japanese complex verbs in the lexicon: Evidence from Japanese dysphasics. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics. 10:1994;194-205.
7. Gopnik M. Impairment of tense in a familial language disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 8:1994a;109-133.
8. Gopnik M. The Perceptual Processing Hypothesis Revisited. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics. 10:1994b;135-141.
9. Gopnik M., Goad H. What underlies inflectional error patterns in genetic dysphasia? Journal of Neurolinguistics. 10:1997;109-137.
10. Guilfoyle, E, Allen, S, &, Moss, S. 1991, Specific language impairment and the maturation of functional categories. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
11. Haegeman L. Introduction to government and binding theory. 1991;Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
12. Hale K., Keyser S. J. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. Hale K., Keyser S. J. The View from Building 20. 1993;53-109 MIT Press, Cambridge.
13. Harada, K, &, Furuta, T. 1998, On the acquisition of Japanese passives: Continuity vs. maturation. In, Researching and Verifying an Advanced Theory of Human Language: COE Report, (2B) (pp, 689, - 708), Chiba, Japan, Kanda University of International Studies.
14. Harley, H. 1995, Subjects, Events and Licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
15. Hoshi H. Theta-role assignment, passivization, and excorporation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics. 3:1994;147-178.
16. Inoue K. Syugo-no Imi-yakuwari to Kaku-hairetsu [Thematic roles of subjects and Case assignment]. Kuno S., Shibatani M. Nihongo-no Shin-tenkai [New Developments in Japanese Linguistics]. 1989;Taisyuukan, Tokyo.
17. Ito K. Kodomo-no Kotoba: Syuutoku to Soozoo [Child Language: Acquisition and Creation]. 1990;Keisoo Syoboo, Tokyo.
18. Kitagawa, Y, &, Kuroda, S. Y. 1992, Passives in Japanese. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester and University of California at San Diego.
19. Kubo, M. 1990, Japanese Passives. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
20. Kuno S. The Structure of the Japanese Language. 1973;MIT Press, Cambridge.
21. Kuroda S. Y. On Japanese Passives. Bedell G., Kobayashi E., Muraki M. Exploration in linguistics: Papers in honor of Kazuko Inoue. 1979;305-347 Kenkyuusha, Tokyo.
22. Leonard L. B. Functional categories in the grammars of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 38:1995;1270-1283.
23. Leonard L. B., Bortolini U., Caselli M. C., McGregor K. K., Sabbadini L. Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: The status of features in the underlying grammar. Language Acquisition. 2:1992;151-179.
24. Loeb D. F., Leonard L. B. Subject case marking and verb morphology in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 34:1991;340-346.
25. Matsuoka, M. 1999, A reconsideration of unaccusativity in ergative alternations, Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics XVIII, 351-363.
26. Miyagawa S. Syntax and semantics 22: Structure and case marking in Japanese. 1989;Academic Press, New York.
27. Paradis M., Gopnik M. Compensatory strategies in genetic dysphasia: Declarative memory. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 10:1997;173-186.
28. Piggott G. L., Kessler Robb M. Prosodic features of Familial Language Impairment: Constraints on stress assignment. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 51:1999;55-69.
29. Pinker S., Prince A. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition. 28:1988;73-193.
30. Rice M. L., Wexler K., Cleave P. Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 38:1995;850-861.
31. Ritter E., Rosen S. T. Deriving causation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 11:1993;519-555.
32. Shibatani M. The languages of Japan. 1990;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Tallal P., Townsend S., Curtiss S., Wulfeck B. B. Phenotypic profiles of language-impaired children based on genetic/family history. Brain and Language. 41:1991;81-95.
34. Terada, M. 1990, Incorporation and argument structure in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
35. Travis, L. 1994, Event phrase and a theory of functional categories, Proceedings of the 1994 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, (pp. 559-570).
36. Travis L. The L-syntax/S-syntax boundary: Evidence from Austronesian. Paul I., Phillips V., Travis L. Formal issues in Austronesian syntax. 1999;151-175 Kluwer, Dordrecht.
37. Tsujimura N. On the semantic properties of unaccusativity. Journal of Japanese Linguistics. 13:1991;91-116.
38. Ullman M., Gopnik M. The production of inflectional morphology in hereditary specific language impairment. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics. 10:1994;81-118.
39. van der Lely H. J. K. Canonical linking rules: Forward vs. reverse linking in normally developing and specifically language impaired children. Cognition. 51:1994;29-72.