Spatial econometric models for simultaneous systems: Application for rural community growth in France

International Regional Science Review

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 171-193

  Henry, Mark S ^a   Schmitt, Bertrand ^b   Piguet, Virginie ^b  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMETRICS; MODELING; RURAL DEVELOPMENT; SETTLEMENT PATTERN; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

FRANCE;

EID: 0035003505     PISSN: 01600176     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016001701761013169     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anas, Alex, Richard Arnott, and Kenneth A. Small. 1998. Urban spatial structure. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 1426-64.
2. Anselin, Luc. 1980. Estimation methods for spatial autoregressive structures. Regional Science Dissertation and Monograph Series No. 8, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
3. _. 1999. Spatial data analysis with SpaceStat and Arc View, Workbook, 3d ed. Urbana: Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois.
4. Anselin, Luc, and Harry H. Kelejian. 1997. Testing for spatial error autocorrelation in the presence of endogenous regressors. International Regional Science Review 20: 153-82.
5. Barkley, David, Mark S. Henry, and Shuming Bao. 1996. Identifying spread vs. backwash effects in regional economic areas: A density function approach. Land Economics 72: 336-57.
6. Boamet, Marion G. 1992. Intra-metropolitan growth patterns: The nature and causes of population and employment changes within an urban area. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
7. _. 1994. An empirical model of intrametropolitan population and employment growth. Papers in Regional Science 73: 135-53.
8. Brueckner, Jan K. 2000. Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 23: 160-71.
9. Carlino, Gerald A., and E. S. Mills. 1987. The determinants of county growth. Journal of Regional Science 27: 39-54.
10. Cochrane, D., and G. H. Orcutt. 1949. Application of least squares regressions to relationships containing autocorrelated error terms. Journal of the American Statistical Association 44: 32-61.
11. Dietz, Richard. 1998. A joint model of residential and employment location in urban areas. Journal of Urban Economics 44: 197-215.
12. Goffette-Nagot, Florence. 1999. Urban spread beyond the city edge. In Economics of cities, edited by J. -M. Huriot and J. -F. Thisse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Goffette-Nagot, Florence, and Bertrand Schmitt. 1999. Agglomeration economies and spatial configurations in rural areas. Environment and Planning A 31: 1239-57.
14. Hansen, Niles, ed. 1972. Growth centers in regional economic development. New York: Free Press.
15. Henry, Mark S., David Barkley, and Shuming Bao. 1997. The Hinterland's stake in metropolitan: Growth: Evidence from selected southern regions. Journal of Regional Science 37: 479-501.
16. Henry, M. S., M. Drabenstott, and L. Gibson. 1988. A changing rural economy. In Rural America in transition, edited by M. Drabenstott and L. Gibson, 15-37. Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
17. Henry, M. S., B. Schmitt, K. Kristensen, D. Barkley. and S. Bao, 1999. Extending Carlino-Mills models to examine urban size and growth impacts on proximate rural areas. Growth and Change 30: 526-48.
18. Hughes, D., and D. Holland. 1994. Core-periphery economic linkage: A measure of spread and possible backwash effects for the Washington economy. Land Economics 70: 364-77.
19. Kelejian, H. H., and W. E. Dates. 1989. Introduction to econometrics, 3d ed. New York: Harper & Row.
20. Kelejian, H. H., and Ingmar R. Prucha. 1997. Estimation of spatial regression models with autoregressive errors by two-stage least squares procedures: A serious problem. International Regional Science Review 20: 103-11.
21. _. 1998. A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 17: 99-121.
22. Kilkenny, M. 1998a. Transport costs and rural development. Journal of Regional Science 38: 293-312.
23. _. 1998b. Transport costs, the new economic geography and rural development. Growth and Change 29: 259-80.
24. Mulligan, G. F., S. M. Glavac, and A. C. Vias. 1997. Initial diagnostics of a population-employment adjustment model (Discussion paper 97-2). Tucson: Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona.
25. Rey, Sergio J., and Marlon G. Boarnet. 2001. A taxonomy of spatial econometric models for simultaneous equation systems. In Advances in spatial econometrics, edited by L. Anselin and R. Florax. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
26. Schmitt, Bertrand. 1999. Economic geography and contemporary rural dynamics: An empirical test on some French regions. Regional Studies 33: 697-711.
27. Schmitt, Bertrand, and Mark S. Henry. 2000. Size and growth of employment centers in French labor market areas: Consequences for rural population and employment. Regional Science &. Urban Economics 30: 1-21.
28. Searching for common ground in the debate over urban sprawl. 1999. Chronicle of Higher Education 21, May, p. A15.
29. Steinnes, Don, and Walter Fisher. 1974. An econometric model of intraurban location. Journal of Regional Science 14: 65-80.
30. Voith, Richard. 1998. Do cities need suburbs? Journal of Regional Science 38: 445-64.