Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Latency and Conduction Time of Short-Latency Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

Clinical EEG and Neuroscience

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 75-81

  Shiga, Y ^a   Yamada, T ^a   Ofuji, A ^a   Fujita, Y ^a   Kawamura, T ^a   Inoue, K ^a   Hada, Y ^a   Yamazaki, H ^a   Cheng, M H ^a   Yeh, M H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Onset Latency; Peak Latency; Peripheral Conduction Time; Somatosensory Evoked Potential; Stimulus Intensity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVOKED RESPONSE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEDIAN NERVE; NERVE CONDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURAL NERVE; TIBIAL NERVE;

ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; HUMANS; MALE; NEURAL CONDUCTION; PERIPHERAL NERVES; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0034999455     PISSN: 15500594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/155005940103200206     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Lesser RP Koehle R Lueders H. Effect of stimulus intensity on short latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1979; 47: 377-382.
2. Tsuji S Lueders H Dinner DS Lesser RP Klem G. Effect of stimulus intensity on subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials by posterior tibial nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 59: 229-237.
3. Rappaport M Portillo S. Ruitz Leonard J. Effects of stimulus intensity on posterior tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. Clin Electroencephalogr 1992; 23: 89-94.
4. Rappaport M Portillo S. Ruitz Oritz D Fountain SS Kula TA Jr. Effects of stimulus intensity and duration on posterior tibial nerve somatosensory-evoked potential patterns obtained under anesthesia. Spine 1994; 19: 1525-1529.
5. Umino M Ohwatari T Nagao M. A new method of recording somatosensory evoked potentials by randomized electrical tooth stimulation with 6 levels of intensity. Pain 1995; 64: 269-276.
6. Huttunen J. Effects of stimulus intensity on frontal, central and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials after median nerve stimulation. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 35: 217-223.
7. King PJL Chiappa KH Effect of stimulus intensity on latency of tibial evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 5: 203-204.
8. Kimura J. Principles of nerve conduction studies. In: Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscles: Principles and Practice, 1st ed. Philadelphia: FADavis; 1983: 83-104.
9. Ozaki I Takada H Baba M Matsunaga M. Correlation of somatosensory central conduction time with height. Neurology 1994; 44: 1115-1119.
10. Gassel MM A study of femoral nerve conduction time. Arch Neurol 1963; 9: 607-614.
11. Hodes R Gribetz I Moskovitz JA Wagman IH Low threshold associated with slow conduction velocity. Arch Neurol 1965; 12: 510-526.
12. Kadrie HA Yates SK Milner-Brown HS Brown WF Multiple point electrical stimulation of ulnar and median nerves. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1976; 39: 973-985.
13. Kuwabara S Nagase H Arai K Hattori A. Slowly conducting, low-threshold components of sensory nerve potentials in peripheral neuropathy: A microneurographic study. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20: 961-968.
14. Wiederholt WC Threshold and conduction velocity in isolated mixed mammalian nerves. Neurology 1969; 19: 347-352.
15. Wiederholt WC Stimulus intensity and site of excitation in human median nerve sensory fibers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1970; 33: 438-441.