The public relevance of international security research in an era of globalism

International Studies Perspectives

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 221-230

  Malin, Martin ^a   Latham, Robert ^b  

^a AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (United States)

^b SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United States)

Author keywords

International security; Public impact; Relevance

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 0034997430     PISSN: 15283577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1528-3577.00051     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BARLETTA, M. (1998) Chemical Weapons in the Sudan: Allegations and Evidence. Nonproliferation Review (fall):115-136.
2. BIN, L. (1997) Nuclear Missile Delivery Capabilities in Emerging Nuclear States. Science & Global Security 6.
3. BUKHARIN, O. (1997a) The Future of Russia's Plutonium Cities. International Security 21:126-158.
4. BUKHARIN, O. (1997b) "Minatom and Nuclear Threat Reduction Activities." In Dismantling the Cold War: U.S. and NIS Perspectives on the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, edited by J. Shield and W. Potter, pp. 211-230. Boston: MIT Press.
5. DRUCKMAN, D. (1994) Nationalism, Patriotism and Group Loyalty: A Social Psychological Perspective. Mershon International Studies Review 38:43-68.
6. FEIVESON, H., ED. (1999) The Nuclear Turning Point: A Blueprint for Deep Cuts and De-Altering of Nuclear Weapons. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
7. GEIGER, R. (1993) Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. GEORGE, A. L. (1993) Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Institute of Peace.
9. GHAZI, P. (1999) The Guardian, March 31.
10. GLEICK, P. (1993) Water and Conflict. International Security 18:79-112.
11. HERMANN, M. G., AND R. B. WOYACH (1994) Toward Reflection, Evaluation, and Integration in International Studies: An Editorial Perspective. Mershon International Studies Review 38:1-10.
12. HOPMANN, P. T. (1994) French Perspectives on International Relations After the Cold War. Mershon International Studies Review 38:69-94.
13. JONES, S., AND F. N. VON HIPPEL (1997) The Slow Death of Japan's Fast Breeder Reactor. Bulletin of the Atomic Sciences (September/October):46-51.
14. KEGLEY, C. W., JR. (1994) How Did the Cold War Die: Principles for an Autopsy. Mershon International Studies Review 38:11-42.
15. LATHAM, R. (1995) Thinking About Security After the Cold War. International Studies Notes 20:9-16.
16. LEWIS, G., AND T. POSTOL (1997) Portrait of a Bad Idea. Bulletin of the Atomic Sciences (July/August):18-25.
17. LEWIS, G., AND H. YINGBO (1998) U.S. Missile Defense Activities and the Future of the ABM Treaty. Physics and Society (January):8-10.
18. LOWEN, R. (1997) Creating the Cold War University. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Press.
19. MACFARLANE, A. (1998) Immobilization of Excess Weapons Plutonium: Reasonable Alternatives to Vitrification. Science and Global Security 7:271-309.
20. NEWSOM, D. D. (1995-96) Foreign Policy and Academia. Foreign Policy 101:53-67.
21. NYE, J. S., AND S. M. LYNN-JONES (1988) International Security Studies: A Report of a Conference on the State of the Field. International Security 12:5-27.
22. RAMANA, M. V., AND F. VON HIPPEL (1998) Does India Need the H-bomb? The Hindu, December 23.
23. SIVERSON, R. M. (2000) A Glass Half-Full? No, but Perhaps a Glass Filling: The Contributions of International Politics Research to Policy. Political Science and Politics 23:59-64.
24. WALT, S. (1991) The Renaissance of Security Studies. International Studies Quarterly 35:211-240.
25. WRIGHT, D. (1999) Cut North Korea Some Slack. Bulletin of the Atomic Sciences (March/April):54-58.
26. WRIGHT, D., AND L. GRONLUND (1997) Missile Defense: The Sequel. Technology Review (May/June): 28-36.