Identification of the Sin3-binding site in Ume6 defines a two-step process for conversion of Ume6 from a transcriptional repressor to an activator in yeast

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 2057-2069

  Washburn, Brian K ^a   Esposito, Rochelle Easton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; PROTEIN RPD3; PROTEIN SIN3; PROTEIN UME6; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS CONTROL; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN ISOLATION; REPRESSOR GENE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPOROGENESIS; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; MEIOSIS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SPORES, FUNGAL; TRANS-ACTIVATORS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; YEASTS;

METAZOA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0034996711     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.6.2057-2069.2001     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Ahringer, J. 2000. NuRD and SIN3 histone deacetylase complexes in development. Trends Genet. 16:351-356.
2. Anderson, S. F., C. M. Steber, R. E. Esposito, and J. E. Coleman. 1995. UME6, a negative regulator of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, contains a C-terminal Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster that binds the URSI DNA sequence in a zinc-dependent manner. Protein Sci. 4:1832-1843.
3. Ayer, D. E. 1999. Historic deacetylases: transcriptional repression with SINers and NuRDs. Trends Cell Biol. 9:193-198.
4. Ayer, D. E., C. D. Laherty, Q. A. Lawrence, A. P. Armstrong, and R. N. Eisenman. 1996. Mad proteins contain a dominant transcription repression domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5772-5781.
5. Ayer, D. E., Q. A. Lawrence, and R. N. Eisenman. 1995. Mad-Max transcriptional repression is mediated by ternary complex formation with mammalian homologs of yeast repressor Sin3. Cell 80:767-776.
6. Bartel, P. L., C.-T. Chien, R. Sternglanz, and S. Fields. 1993. Using the two-hybrid system to detect protein-protein interactions, p. 153-179. In D. A. Hartley (ed.), Cellular interactions in development: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
7. Bauer, A., W. Mikulits, G. Lagger, G. Stengl, C. Brosch, and H. Beug. 1998. The thyroid hormone receptor functions as a ligand-operated developmental switch between proliferation and differentiation of erythroid progenitors. EMBO J. 17:4291-4303.
8. Bowdish, K. S., and A. P. Mitchell. 1993. Bipartite structure of an early meiotic upstream activation sequence from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:2172-2181.
9. Bowdish, K. S., H. E. Yuan, and A. P. Mitchell. 1995. Positive control of yeast meiotic genes by the negative regulator UME6. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2955-2961.
10. Buckingham, L. E., H. T. Wang, R. T. Elder, R. M. McCarroll, M. R. Slater, and R. E. Esposito. 1990. Nueleotide sequence and promoter analysis of SPOI3, a meiosis-specilic gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:9406-9410.
11. Burgess, S. M., M. Ajimura, and N. Kleckner. 1999. GCN5-dependent histone H3 acetylation and RPD3-dependent histone H4 deacetylation have distinct, opposing effects on IME2 transcription, during meiosis and during vegetative growth, in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6835-6840.
12. Chi, M. H., and D. Shore. 1996. SUMI-1, a dominant suppressor of SIR mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, increases transcriptional silencing at telomeres and HM mating-type loci and decreases chromosome stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4281-4294.
13. Chu, S., J. DeRisi, M. Eisen, J. Mulholland, D. Botstein, P. O. Brown, and I. Herskowitz. 1998. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 282:699-705.
14. Dang, C. V. 1999. c-Myc target genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis, and metabolism. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1-11.
15. David, G., L. Alland, S. H. Hong, C. W. Wong, R. A. DePinho, and A. Dejean. 1998. Histone deacetylase associated with mSin3A mediates repression by the acute promyclocytic leukemia-associated PLZF protein. Oncogene 16: 2549-2556.
16. Deleage, G., and B. Roux. 1987. An algorithm for protein secondary structure prediction based on class prediction. Protein Eng. 1:289-294.
17. Dhordain, P., R. J. Lin, S. Quief, D. Lantoine, J. Kerckaert, R. M. Evans, and O. Albagli. 1998. The LAZ3(BCL-6) oncoprotein recruits a SMRT/mSIN3A/histone deracetylase containing complex to mediate transcriptional repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:4645-4651.
18. Eilers, A. L., A. N. Billin, J. Liu, and D. E. Aver. 1994. A 13-amino acid amphipathic alpha-helix is required for the functional interaction between the transcriptional repressor Mad1 and mSin.3A. J. Biol. Chem. 274:32750-32756.
19. Einerhand, A. W., W. Kos, W. C. Smart, A. J. Kal, H. F. Tabak, and T. G. Cooper. 1995. The upstream region of the FOX3 gene encoding peroxisomal 3-oxoacyl-coenzyme A thiolase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains ABF1- and replication protein A-binding sites that participate in its regulation by glucose repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:3405-3414.
20. Elkhaimi, M., M. R. Kaadige, D. Kamath, J. C. Jackson, H. Biliran, Jr., and J. M. Lopes. 2000. Combinatorial regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression by the UME6, SIN3 and RPD3 genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 3160-3167.
21. Gailus-Durner, V., J. Xie, C. Chintamaneni, and A. K. Vershon. 1996. Participation of the yeast activator Abf1 in meiosis-specific expression of the IIOP1 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2777-2786.
22. Geourjon, C., and G. Deleage. 1994. SOPM: a self-optimized method for protein secondary structure prediction. Protein Eng. 7:157-164.
23. Geourjon, C., and G. Deleage. 1995. SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 11:681-684.
24. Gibrat, J. F., J. Garnier, and B. Robson. 1987. Further developments of protein secondary structure prediction using information theory. New parameters and consideration of residue pairs. J. Mol. Biol. 198:425-443.
25. Gietz, R. D., and R. H. Sehiestl. 1995. Transforming yeast with DNA. Methods Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:255-269.
26. Glass, C. K., and M. G. Rosenfeld. 2000. The coregulator exchange in transcriptional functions of nuclear receptors. Genes Dev. 14:121-141.
27. Goldmark, J. P., T. G. Fazzio, P. W. Estep, G. M. Church, and T. Tsukiyama. 2000. The Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex represses early meiotic genes upon recruitment by Ume6p. Cell 103:423-433.
28. Gray, W. M., and J. S. Fassler. 1996. Isolation and analysis of the yeast TEA1 gene, which encodes a zinc cluster Ty enhancer-binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:347-358.
29. Guan, K. L., and J. E. Dixon. 1991. Eukaryotic proteins expressed in Escherichia coli: an improved thrombin cleavage and purification procedure of fusion proteins with glutathione S-transferase. Anal. Biochem. 192:262-267.
30. Harper, S. E., Y. Qiu, and P. A. Sharp. 1996. Sin3 corepressor function in Myc-induced transcription and transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:8536-8540.
31. Hassig, C. A., and S. L. Schreiber. 1997. Nuclear histone acetylases and deacetylases and transcriptional regulation: HATs off to HDACs. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1:300-308.
32. Hepworth, S. R., H. Friesen, and J. Segall. 1998. NDT80 and the meiotic recombination checkpoint regulate expression of middle sporulation-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:5750-5761.
33. Hochstrasser, M. 1996. Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30:405-439.
34. Hughes, T. R., M. J. Marton, A. R. Jones, C. J. Roberts, R. Stoughton, C. D. Armour, H. A. Bennett, E. Coffey, H. Dai, Y. D. He, M. J. Kidd, A. M. King, M. R. Meyer, D. Slade, P. Y. Lum, S. B. Slepaniants, D. D. Shoemaker, D. Gachotte, K. Chakraburtty, J. Simon, M. Bard, and S. H. Friend. 2000. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102:109-126.
35. Hurlin, P. J., C. Queva, and R. N. Eisenman. 1997. Mnt, a novel Max-interacting protein is coexpressed with Myc in proliferating cells and mediates repression at Myc binding sites. Genes Dev. 11:44-58.
36. Hurlin, P. J., C. Queva, P. J. Koskinen, E. Steingrimsson, D. E. Ayer, N. G. Copeland, N. A. Jenkins, and R. N. Eisenman. 1995. Mad3 and Mad4: novel Max-interacting transcriptional repressors that suppress c-myc dependent transformation and are expressed during neural and epidermal differentiation. EMBO J. 14:5646-5659.
37. Jackson, J. C., and J. M. Lopes. 1996. The yeast UME6 gene is required for both negative and positive transcriptional regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:1322-1329.
38. James, P., J. Halladay, and E. A. Craig. 1996. Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144:1425-1436.
39. Kadosh, D., and K. Struhl. 1998. Histone deacetylase activity of Rpd3 is important for transcriptional repression in vivo. Genes Dev. 12:797-805.
40. Kadosh, D., and K. Struhl. 1997. Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell 89:365-371.
41. Kadosh, D., and K. Struhl. 1998. Targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex generates a highly localized domain of repressed chromatin in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:5121-5127.
42. Kasten, M. M., D. E. Ayer, and D. J. Stillman. 1996. SIN3-dependent transcriptional repression by interaction with the Mad1 DNA-binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4215-4221.
43. Kasten, M. M., S. Dorland, and D. J. Stillman. 1997. A large protein complex containing the yeast Sin3p and Rpd3p transcriptional regulators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4852-4858.
44. Kasten, M. M., and D. J. Stillman. 1997. Identification of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes STB1-STB5 encoding Sin3p binding proteins. Mol. Gen. Genet. 256:376-386.
45. Klapholz, S., and R. E. Esposilo. 1980. Recombination and chromosome segregation during the single division meiosis in SPOI2-1 and SPOI3-1 diploids. Genetics 96:589-611.
46. Kouzarides, T. 2000. Acelylation: a regulatory modification to rival phosphorylation? EMBO J. 19:1176-1179.
47. Kratzer, S., and H. J. Schuller. 1997. Transcriptional control of the yeast acetyl-CoA synthelase gene, ACS1, by the positive regulators CAT8 and ADR1 and the pleiolropic repressor UME6. Mol. Microbiol. 26:631-641.
48. Kupiec, M., B. Byers, R. E. Esposito, and A. P. Mitchell. 1997. Meiosis and sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, p. 889-1036. In J. R. Pringle, J. R. Broach, and E. W. Jones (ed.), The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces, vol. 3. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
49. Laherty, C. D., A. N. Billin, R. M. Lavinsky, G. S. Yochum, A. C. Bush, J. M. Sun, T. M. Mullen, J. R. Davie, D. W. Rose, C. K. Glass, M. G. Rosenfeld, D. E. Ayer, and R. N. Eisenman. 1998. SAP30, a component of the mSin3 corepressor complex involved in N-CoR-mediated repression by specific transcription factors. Mol. Cell 2:33-42.
50. Leberer, E., D. Y. Thomas, and M. Whiteway. 1997. Pheromone signalling and polarized morphogenesis in yeast. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:59-66.
51. Legrain, P., M. C. Dukhelar, and C. Transy. 1994. Detection of protein-protein interactions using different vectors in the two-hybrid system. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:3241-3242.
52. Levin, J. M., B. Robson, and J. Garnier. 1986. An algorithm for secondary structure determination in proteins based on sequence similarity. FEBS Lett. 205:303-308.
53. Lin, B. C., S. H. Hong, S. Krig, S. M. Yoh, and M. L. Privalsky. 1997. A conformational switch in nuclear hormone receptors is involved in coupling hormone binding to corepressor release. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6131-6138.
54. Lin, R. J., D. A. Egan, and R. M. Evans. 1999. Molecular genetics of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Trends Genet. 15:179-184.
55. Malathi, K., Y. Xiao, and A. P. Mitchell. 1997. Interaction of yeast repressor-activator protein Ume6p with glycogen synthase kinase 3 homolog Rim11p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:7230-7236.
56. Mandel, S., K. Robzyk, and Y. Kassir. 1994. IMEI gene encodes a transcription factor which is required to induce meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Dev. Genet. 15:139-147.
57. McArthur, G. A., C. D. Laherty, C. Queva, P. J. Hurlin, L. Loo, L. James, C. Grandori, P. Gallant, Y. Shiio, W. C. Hokanson, A. C. Bush, P. F. Cheng, Q. A. Lawrence, B. Pulverer, P. J. Koskinen, K. P. Foley, D. E. Ayer, and R. N. Eisenman. 1998. The Mad protein family links transcriptional repression to cell differentiation. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 63:423-433.
58. McMahon, S. B., M. A. Wood, and M. D. Cole. 2000. The essential cofactor TRRAP recruits the historic acetyltransferase hGCNS to c-Myc. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:556-562.
59. Meroni, G., A. Reymond, M. Alcalay, G. Borsani, A. Tanigami, R. Tonlorenzi, C. L. Nigro, S. Messali, M. Zollo, D. H. Ledbetter, R. Brent, A. Ballabio, and R. Carrozzo. 1997. Rox, a novel bHLHZip protein expressed in quiescent cells that heterodimerizes with Max, binds a non-canonical E box and acts as a transcriptional repressor. EMBO J. 16:2892-2906.
60. Messenguy, F., F. Vierendeels, B. Scherens, and E. Dubois. 2000. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, expression of arginine catabolic genes CAR1 and CAR2 in response to exogenous nitrogen availability is mediated by the Ume6 (CargRI)-Sin3 (CargRII)-Rpd3 (CargRIII) complex. J. Bacteriol. 182:3158-3164.
61. Mitchell, A. P. 1994. Control of meiotic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 58:56-70.
62. Mitchell, D. A., T. K. Marshall, and R. J. Deschenes. 1993. Vectors for the inducible overexpression of glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins in yeast. Yeast 9:715-722.
63. Primig, M., R. M. Williams, E. A. Winzeler, G. G. Tevzadze, A. R. Conway, S. Y. Hwang, R. W. Davis, and R. E. Esposito. 2000. The core meiotic transcriptome in budding yeasts. Nat. Genet. 26:415-423.
64. Rothstein, R. 1991. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194:281-301.
65. Rubin-Bejerano, I., S. Mandel, K. Robzyk, and Y. Kassir. 1996. Induction of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on conversion of the transcriptional represssor Ume6 to a positive regulator by its regulated association with the transcriplional activator Ime1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2518-2526.
66. Rundlett, S. E., A. A. Carmen, N. Suka, B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein. 1998. Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature 392:831-835.
67. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
68. Schreiber-Agus, N., L. Chin, K. Chen, R. Torres, G. Rao, P. Guida, A. I. Skoultchi, and R. A. DePinho. 1995. An amino-terminal domain of Mxi1 mediates anti-Myc oncogenic activity and interacts with a homolog of the yeast transcriptional repressor SIN3. Cell 80:777-786.
69. Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19-27.
70. Slekar, K. H., and S. A. Henry. 1995. SIN3 works through two different promoter elements Io regulate INO1 gene expression in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:1964-1969.
71. Smart, W. C., J. A. Coffman, and T. G. Cooper. 1996. Combinatorial regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CAR1 (arginase) promoter in response to multiple environmental signals. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5876-5887.
72. Smith, H. E., S. E. Driscoll, R. A. Sia, H. E. Yuan, and A. P. Mitchell. 1993. Genetic evidence for transcriptional activation by the yeast IME1 gene product. Genetics 133:775-784.
73. Smith, H. E., S. S. Su, L. Neigeborn, S. E. Driscoll, and A. P. Mitchell. 1990. Role of IME1 expression in regulation of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:6103-6113.
74. Steber, C. M., and R. E. Esposito. 1995. UME6 is a central component of a developmental regulatory switch controlling meiosis-specific gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:12490-12494.
75. Sternberg, P. W., M. J. Stern, I. Clark, and I. Herskowitz. 1987. Activation of the yeast HO gene by release from multiple negative controls. Cell 48:567-577.
76. Strich, R., M. R. Slater, and R. E. Esposito. 1989. Identification of negative regulatory genes that govern the expression of early meiotic genes in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:10018-10022.
77. Strich, R., R. T. Surosky, C. Steber, E. Dubois, F. Messenguy, and R. E. Esposito. 1994. UME6 is a key regulator of nitrogen repression and meiotic development. Genes Dev. 8:796-810.
78. Studier, F. W., A. H. Rosenberg, J. J. Dunn, and J. W. Dubendorff. 1990. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 185:60-89.
79. Sweet, D. H., Y. K. Jang, and G. B. Sancar. 1997. Role of UME6 in transcriptional regulation of a DNA repair gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:6223-6235.
80. Szent-Gyorgyi, C. 1995. A bipartite operator interacts with a heat shock element to mediate early meiotic induction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HSP82. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6754-6769.
81. Thomas, B. J., and R. Rothstein. 1989. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56:619-630.
82. Torchia, J., C. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1998. Co-activators and co-repressors in the integration of transcriptional responses. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10:373-383.
83. Vannier, D., D. Balderes, and D. Shore. 1996. Evidence that the transcriptional regulators SIN3 and RPD3, and a novel gene (SDS3) with similar functions, are involved in transcriptional silencing in S. cerevisiae. Genetics 144:1343-1353.
84. Vershon, A. K., and M. Pierce. 2000. Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in yeast. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:334-339.
85. Vidal, M., and R. F. Gaber. 1991. RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6317-6327.
86. Vidal, M., R. Strich, R. E. Esposito, and R. F. Gaber. 1991. RPD1 (SIN3/UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6306-6316.
87. Wach, A. 1996. PCR-synthesis of marker cassettes with long flanking homology regions for gene disruptions in S. cerevisiae. Yeast 12:259-265.
88. Wang, H., I. Clark, P. R. Nicholson, I. Herskowitz, and D. J. Stillman. 1990. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN3 gene, a negative regulator of HO, contains four paired amphipathic helix motifs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:5927-5936.
89. Wang, H., P. R. Nicholson, and D. J. Stillman. 1990. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA-binding protein involved in transcriptional regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:1743-1753.
90. Wang, H., and D. J. Stillman, 1993. Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:1805-1814.
91. Werner-Washburne, M., E. L. Braun, M. E. Crawford, and V. M. Peck. 1996. Stationary phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 19:1159-1166.
92. Wolffe, A. P. 1997. Transcriptional control. Sinful repression. Nature 387:16-17.
93. Xiao, Y., and A. P. Mitchell. 2000. Shared roles of yeast glycogen synthase kinase 3 family members in nitrogen-responsive phosphorylation of meiotic regulator Ume6p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5447-5453.
94. Xie, J., M. Pierce, V. Gailus-Durner, M. Wagner, E. Winter, and A. K. Vershon. 1999. Sum1 and Hst1 repress middle sporulation-specific gene expression during mitosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 18:6448-6454.
95. Zhang, Y., R. Iratni, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and D. Reinberg. 1997. Histone deacetylases and SAPI8, a novel polypeptide, are components of a human Sin3 complex. Cell 89:357-364.