Geographic patterns of trading profitability in Xetra

European Economic Review

Volumn 45, Issue 4-6, 2001, Pages 757-769

  Hau, Harald ^a,b  

^a INSEAD   (France)

^b CEPR   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Geography; Home bias; Trading profits

Indexed keywords

PROFITABILITY; STOCK MARKET; TRADE PERFORMANCE;

GERMANY;

EID: 0034996502     PISSN: 00142921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00122-2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bacidore, J.M., Sofianos, G., 2000. NYSE specialists trading in non-U.S. stocks. Working Paper No. 2000-05, NYSE, New York.
2. Choe, H., Kho, B.-C., Stulz, R., 2000. Do domestic investors have more valuable information about individual stocks than Foreign investors? Working paper 2000-21, Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University.
3. Choi S.-R., Tschoegl A.E., Yu C.-M. Banks and the world's major financial centers, 1970-1980. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 122(1):1986;48-64.
4. Choi S.-R., Tschoegl A.E., Yu C.-M. Banks and the world's major banking centers, 1990. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 132(4):1996;774-793.
5. Coval J.D., Moskowitz T.J. Home bias at home: Local equity preferences in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance. 54:1999;2045-2074.
6. Coval, J.D., Moskowitz, T.J., 1999b. The geography of investment: Informed trading and asset prices. Working paper, University of Michigan.
7. DB, 1998. [Deutsche Börse AG], Xetra market model, release 3, Frankfurt.
8. Engle R. Band spectrum regression. International Economic Review. 15:1974;1-11.
9. Engle R. Testing price equations for stability across spectral frequency bands. Econometrica. 46:1978;869-881.
10. Gehrig T. An information based explanation of the domestic bias in international equity investment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 21:1993;7-109.
11. Gehrig, T., 1998. Cities and the geography of financial centers. Discussion paper no. 1894, CEPR, London.
12. Grinblatt M., Keloharju M. The investment behavior and performance of various investor types: A study of Finland's unique data set. Journal of Financial Economics. 55:1999;43-67.
13. Grinblatt, M., Keloharju, M., 2001. How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. Journal of Finance 56 (April).
14. Hamilton J. Time Series Analysis. 1994;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. Hansch O., Naik N.Y., Viswanathan S. Do inventories matter in dealership markets? Evidence from the London Stock Exchange. Journal of Finance. 53:1998;1623-1655.
16. Hasbrouck J., Sofianos G. The trades of market makers: An empirical analysis of NYSE specialists. Journal of Finance. 48:1993;1565-1593.
17. Hau, H., 2000. Location matters: An examination of trading profits. Journal of Finance, forthcoming.
18. Lewis K. Trying to explain home bias in equities and consumption. Journal of Economic Literature. 37:1999;571-608.
19. Portes, R., Rey, H., 1999. The determinants of cross-border equity flows: The geography of information. Working paper W7336, NBER, Boston, MA.
20. Seasholes, M.S., 2000. Smart foreign traders in emerging markets. Working paper, Harvard University.
21. Shukla R.K., van Inwegen G.B. Do locals perform better than foreigners? An analysis of U.K. and U.S. mutual fund managers. Journal of Economics and Business. 47:1995;241-254.
22. Williamson, J., Mahar, M., 1998. A survey of financial liberalization. Essays in International Finance, no. 211, International Finance Section, Princeton University.