Allometry of the Growth of Pink Shrimp Farfantepenaeus duorarum in a Subtropical Bay

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 130, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 328-335

  Diaz, Guillermo A ^a   Smith, Steven G ^a   Serafy, Joseph E ^a   Ault, Jerald S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; CRUSTACEAN; GROWTH; LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIP; NUMERICAL MODEL;

UNITED STATES;

CRUSTACEA; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); FARFANTEPENAEUS DUORARUM; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 0034988457     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(2001)130<0328:AOTGOP>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, R. O., and R. M. Neumann. 1996. Length, weight, and associated structural indices. Pages 447-482 in B. R. Murphy and D. W. Willis, editors. Fisheries Techniques, 2nd edition. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
2. Ault, J. S., G. A. Diaz, S. G. Smith, J. Luo, and J. E. Serafy. 1999a. An efficient sampling survey design to estimate pink shrimp population abundance in Biscayne Bay, Florida. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:696-712.
3. Ault, J. S., J. Luo, S. G. Smith, J. D. Wang, R. Humston, and G. A. Diaz. 1999b. A spatial dynamic multistock production model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56 (Supplement 1):4-25.
4. Bielsa, L. M., W. H. Murdich, and R. F. Labisky. 1983. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (south Florida)—pikkshrimp.U.S.Fishadd Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-82/11, and U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, TR EL-82-4:1-21, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
5. Busacker, G. P, I. R. Adelman, and E. M. Goolish. 1990. Growth. Pages 363-387 in C. B. Schreck and P B. Moyle, editors. Methods for Fish Biology. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
6. Campos, W. L., and S. A. Berkeley. 1986. Impact of the commercial fishery on the population of bait shrimp (Penaeus spp.) in Biscayne Bay. Final report to Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management, Miami.
7. Carroll, R. J., and D. Ruppert. 1988. Transformation and weighting in regression. Chapman and Hall, New York.
8. Chin, E. 1960. The bait shrimp fishery of Galveston Bay, Texas. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 89:135-141.
9. Cobb, J. S., and D. Wang. 1985. Fisheries biology of lobsters and crayfishes. Pages 167-247 in A. J. Provenzano, Jr., editor. The biology of Crustacea, Volume 10. Economic aspects: fisheries and culture. Academic Press, New York.
10. Devi, C. B. L., K. K. C. Nair, T. Balasubramanian, T C. Gopalakrishnan, P. N. Aravindakashan, and M. K. Kutty. 1983. Length—weight relation and condition factor of Penaeus indicus and Metapenaeus dobsoni in the Cochin backwater. Dona Paula (MA-HASAGAR) 16(3):399-402.
11. Eldred, B., K. W. Woodburn, R. F. Hutton, and H. Jones. 1961. Biological observations on the commercial shrimp, Penaeus duorarum Burkenroad, in Florida waters. Marine Laboratory of Florida, Professional Paper Series 3, St. Petersburg.
12. Fontaine, C. T, and R. A. Neal. 1971. Length—weight relations for three commercially important penaeid shrimps of the Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 100:584-586.
13. Garcia, S., and L. Le Restre. 1981. Life cycles, dynamics, exploitation and management of coastal penaeid shrimp stocks. FAO (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization) Fisheries Technical Paper 203. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
14. Guitart, B., and R. Reyes. 1978. Relacion entre largos y pesos de las especies comerciales de camaron mas importantes del Banco de Campeche. Revista Cu-bana de Investigaciones Pesqueras 3(2):1-33.
15. Hartnoll, R. G. 1978. The determination of relative growth in Crustacea. Crustaceana 34:281-293.
16. Hartnoll, R. G. 1982. Growth. Pages 111-197 in L. B. Abele, editor. The Biology of Crustacea, Volume 2. Embryology, Morphology, and Genetics. Academic Press, New York.
17. Hutchins, D. L., G. W. Chamberlain, and J. C. Parker. 1979. Length— weight relations for several species of penaeid shrimp cultured in ponds near Corpus Christi, Texas. Proceedings of the World Maricul-ture Society 10:565-570.
18. Iversen, E. S., D. M. Allen, and J. B. Higman. 1993. Shrimp capture and culture fisheries of the United States. Halsted Press, New York.
19. Kutkuhn, J. H. 1966. Dynamics of a penaeid shrimp population and management implications. Fishery Bulletin 65:313-338.
20. Lares, L. B., and N. A. Khandker. 1976. Length—weight relations of pink spotted shrimp Penaeus brasilien-sis Latreille of Caribbean Sea. Boletin del Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidad del Oriente 15:199-200.
21. McCoy, E. 1972. Dynamics of North Carolina commercial shrimp populations. North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic Resources, Division of Commercial and Sports Fisheries, Special Scientific Report 21, Raleigh.
22. McCoy, E. 1968. Migration, growth, and mortality of North Carolina pink and brown penaeid shrimps. North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development, Division of Commercial and Sports Fisheries, Special Scientific Report 15, Raleigh.
23. Nance, J. M. 1989. Stock assessment for brown, white, and pink shrimp in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, 1960-1987. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NMFS-SEFC-221.
24. Neter J., H. K. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Was-serman. 1996. Applied linear statistical models, 4th edition. Irwin, Chicago.
25. NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration). 1999. Fisheries of the United States, 1998. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, Maryland.
26. Pauly, D., and G. R. Morgan. 1987. Length-based methods in fisheries research. ICLARM (International Center for Living Aquatic Resources) conference proceedings 13. Manila, ICLARM Press.
27. Penn, J. W. 1980. Observations on length—weight relationships and distribution of the red spot king prawn, Penaeus longistylus Kubo, in Western Australian waters. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 31:547-552.
28. Perez Farfante, I. 1970. Diagnostic characters of juveniles of the shrimps Penaeus aztecus, P. duorarum duorarum, and P. brasiliensis (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report—Fisheries 599.
29. Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 191:207-215.
30. SAS Institute. 1990. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, 4th edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
31. Seber, G. A. F, and C. J. Wild. 1989. Nonlinear regression. Wiley, New York.
32. Shapiro, S. S., and M. B. Wilk. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591-611.
33. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edition. W. H. Freeman, New York.
34. Solis, N. B. 1988. Biology and ecology. Pages 3-36 in Biology and culture of Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines.
35. Somerton, D. A. 1980. Fitting straight lines to Hiatt growth diagrams: a re-evaluation. Journal du Con-seil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 39: 15-19.
36. Sparre, P., and S. C. Venema. 1992. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1. Manual. FAO (United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization) Fisheries Technical Paper 306.1, Revision 1. United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome.
37. Thomas, M. M. 1975. Age and growth, length—weight relationship and relative condition factor of Penaeus semisulcatus De Haan. Indian Journal of Fisheries 22:133-142.