Global consumption and distributive justice: A Rawlsian perspective

Human Rights Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 171-184

  Hill, Ronald Paul ^a,b   Peterson, Robert M ^b   Dhanda, Kanwalroop Kathy ^b  

^a Department of Social Responsibility ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE; THEORETICAL STUDY; UNITED NATIONS;

EID: 0034979230     PISSN: 02750392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2001.0007     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. JOHN RAWLS, A THEORY OF JUSTICE 126 (1971).
2. See COLLECTED PAPERS: JOHN RAWLS (Samuel Freeman ed., 1999).
3. John Rawls, Justice as Fairness, in SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY III: SOCIAL JUSTICE AND CLASSICAL LIBERAL GOALS 3-33, 17 (Charles K. Rowley ed., 1993); John Rawls, Justice as Fairness, 67 PHILOSOPHICAL REV. 164-94 (1958).
4. John Rawls, Justice as Fairness, in SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY III: SOCIAL JUSTICE AND CLASSICAL LIBERAL GOALS 3-33, 17 (Charles K. Rowley ed., 1993); John Rawls, Justice as Fairness, 67 PHILOSOPHICAL REV. 164-94 (1958).
5. See RAWLS, supra note 1; JOHN RAWLS, POLITICAL LIBERALISM (1993).
6. STEPHEN NATHANSON, ECONOMIC JUSTICE 84 (1998).
7. See RAWLS, supra note 3.
8. John A. Edgren, On the Relevance of John Rawls' Theory of Justice to Welfare Economics, 53 REV. SOCIAL ECONOMY 332, 339 (1995).
9. See generally, EDWARD E. ZAJAC, POLITICAL ECONOMY OF FAIRNESS (1995).
10. RAWLS, supra note 3, at 6.
11. Stephen W. Ball, Economic Equality: Rawls Versus Utilitarianism, 2 ECON. & PHIL. 225 (1986).
12. See RAWLS, supra note 1; RAWLS, supra note 4.
13. See RAWLS supra note 1, at 14-15.
14. John Rawls, Concepts of Distributional Equity: Some Reasons for the Maximin Criterion 64 AM. ECON. REV. 141 (1974).
15. James M. Buchanan, A Hobbesian Interpretation of the Rawlsian Difference Principle, in 29 KYKLOS 5 (1976), reprinted in SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY III: SOCIAL JUSTICE AND CLASSICAL LIBERAL GOAL 127 (Charles K. Rowley ed., 1993).
16. James M. Buchanan, A Hobbesian Interpretation of the Rawlsian Difference Principle, in 29 KYKLOS 5 (1976), reprinted in SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY III: SOCIAL JUSTICE AND CLASSICAL LIBERAL GOAL 127 (Charles K. Rowley ed., 1993).
17. See RAWLS, supra note 1, at 127.
18. See RAWLS, supra note 3.
19. RAWLS, supra note 1, at 92.
20. Richard E. Easterlin, Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All? 27 J. ECON. BEHAV. & ORG. 35 (June 1995); See generally, ROBERT E. LANE, THE MARKET EXPERIENCE (1991).
21. Richard E. Easterlin, Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All? 27 J. ECON. BEHAV. & ORG. 35 (June 1995); See generally, ROBERT E. LANE, THE MARKET EXPERIENCE (1991).
22. PARTHA DASGUPTA, AN INQUIRY INTO WELL-BEING AND DESTITUTION 76 (1993).
23. Sudhir Anand & Amartya K. Sen, Concepts of Human Development and Poverty: A Multidimensional Perspective, in HUMAN DEVELOPMENT PAPERS 1997: POVERTY AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 1997 (1997) [hereinafter UNDP 1997]; AMARTYA SEN, DEVELOPMENT AS FREEDOM (1999).
24. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 1997, at 13-14.
25. See RAWIS, supra note 1, at 98.
26. See RAWLS, supra note 4.
27. Joan Fairhurst, Women and the Effects of State Policy on the Everyday Environment 13 DEV. S. AFR. 143-48 (1996); Fairhurst 1996; MARTHA C. NUSSBAUM & JONATHAN GLOVER, WOMEN, CULTURE, AND DEVELOPMENT: A STUDY OF HUMAN CAPABILITIES (1995); THE QUALITY OF LIFE (Martha C. Nussbaum & Amartya Sen eds., 1993).
28. Joan Fairhurst, Women and the Effects of State Policy on the Everyday Environment 13 DEV. S. AFR. 143-48 (1996); Fairhurst 1996; MARTHA C. NUSSBAUM & JONATHAN GLOVER, WOMEN, CULTURE, AND DEVELOPMENT: A STUDY OF HUMAN CAPABILITIES (1995); THE QUALITY OF LIFE (Martha C. Nussbaum & Amartya Sen eds., 1993).
29. Joan Fairhurst, Women and the Effects of State Policy on the Everyday Environment 13 DEV. S. AFR. 143-48 (1996); Fairhurst 1996; MARTHA C. NUSSBAUM & JONATHAN GLOVER, WOMEN, CULTURE, AND DEVELOPMENT: A STUDY OF HUMAN CAPABILITIES (1995); THE QUALITY OF LIFE (Martha C. Nussbaum & Amartya Sen eds., 1993).
30. Tony Beck, How the Poor Fight for Respect and Resources in Village India, 54 HUMAN ORGANIZATION 169 (1995); Wolfgang Lutz, Female Education Likely to Lead to Long-Term Population Decline and Near-Term Gain in Quality of Life, 16 POLITICS & THE LIFE SCIENCES 209-11 (1997); Nussbaum & Sen eds., supra note 24.
31. Tony Beck, How the Poor Fight for Respect and Resources in Village India, 54 HUMAN ORGANIZATION 169 (1995); Wolfgang Lutz, Female Education Likely to Lead to Long-Term Population Decline and Near-Term Gain in Quality of Life, 16 POLITICS & THE LIFE SCIENCES 209-11 (1997); Nussbaum & Sen eds., supra note 24.
32. See SEN (1999), supra note 20.
33. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 1998 (1998) [hereinafter UNDP 1998].
34. See UNDP 1997, supra note 20.
35. CRITICAL STUDIES ON RAWIS' A THEORY OF JUSTICE (Norman Daniels ed., 1989) (originally published in a slightly different version in 1975).
36. See Thomas Nagel, Rawls on Justice, in CRITICAL STUDIES ON RAWLS' A THEORY OF JUSTICE 1, 16 (Norman Daniels ed., 1989); R.M. Hare, Rawls' Theory of Justice, in CRITICAL STUDIES ON RAWLS' THEORY OF JUSTICE 81, 107 (Norman Daniels ed., 1989).
37. See Thomas Nagel, Rawls on Justice, in CRITICAL STUDIES ON RAWLS' A THEORY OF JUSTICE 1, 16 (Norman Daniels ed., 1989); R.M. Hare, Rawls' Theory of Justice, in CRITICAL STUDIES ON RAWLS' THEORY OF JUSTICE 81, 107 (Norman Daniels ed., 1989).
38. See David Lyons, Nature and Soundness of the Contract and Coherence Arguments, in CRITICAL STUDIES ON RAWLS' A THEORY OF JUSTICE 141 (Norman Daniels ed., 1989).
39. See John Rawls, The Law of Peoples, 20 CRITICAL INQUIRY 36 (1993b).
40. See T.M. Scanlon, Distributive Justice and the Difference Principle, in CRITICAL STUDIES ON RAWLS' A THEORY OF JUSTICE 169-205 (Norman Daniels ed., 1989).
41. See e.g., Clem Tisdell, The Nature of Sustainability and of Sustainable Development, 4 MIDDLE EAST Bus. & ECON. REV. 21 (1992).
42. Roger Taylor, The Environmental Implications of Liberalism, 6 CRITICAL REV. 265 (1993); Rawls, supra note 1, at 285.
43. UNDP 1998, supra note 27.
44. CHARLES PATTERSON, THE OXFORD 50TH ANNIVERSARY BOOK OF THE UNITED NATIONS (1995).
45. UNDP 1997, supra note 20.
46. UNDP 1998, supra note 27.
47. Id.
48. P < .05 or smaller suggests significant differences.
49. See SEN (1999), supra note 20.
50. See Ronald Paul Hill & Bahram Adrangi, Poverty and the United Nations, 18 J. OF PUB. POL'Y & MARKETING 135-46 (Fall 1999).