Moving assertive community treatment into standard practice

Psychiatric Services

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 771-779

  Phillips, S D ^a   Burns, B J ^a   Edgar, E R ^a   Mueser, K T ^a   Linkins, K W ^a   Rosenheck, R A ^a   Drake, R E ^a   McDonel Herr, E C ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNITY CARE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MODEL; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PATIENT CARE TEAM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034976774     PISSN: 10752730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.6.771     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses
2. Assertive community treatment: An update of randomized trials
3. Case management: The current best practices and the next generation of innovation
4. Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness: Critical ingredients and impact on consumers
5. New Directions in Research on Community Treatment
6. Models of community care for severe mental illness: A review of research on case management
7. Assertive community treatment for patients with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorder: A clinical trial
8. Evaluating use of continuous treatment teams for persons with mental illness and substance abuse
9. Economic impacts of assertive community treatment: A review of the literature
10. Estimated societal costs of assertive community mental health care
11. Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment teams
12. Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment for homeless persons with severe mental illness
13. Multisite experimental cost study of intensive psychiatric community care
14. Intersite variation in the impact of intensive psychiatric community care on hospital use
15. Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment versus standard case management for persons with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorders
16. A guide to cost-benefit analysis, as seen through a controlled experiment in treating the mentally ill
17. Survey co-investigators of the PORT project: Translating research into practice: The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) treatment recommendations
18. Extrahospital management of severe mental illness: Feasibility and effects of social functioning
19. Training in community living
20. Alternative to mental hospital treatment: I. Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation
21. Dissemination of assertive community treatment programs
22. The active ingredients of effective case management: A research synthesis
23. The participation of families of homeless persons with severe mental illness in an outreach intervention
24. A randomized trial of assertive community treatment for homeless persons with severe mental illness
25. Implementing assertive community treatment programs in rural settings
26. Providing assertive community treatment for severely mentally ill patients in a rural area
27. Pathways to housing: Supported housing for street-dwelling homeless individuals with psychiatric disabilities
28. Experimental comparison of the effects of three treatment programs for homeless mentally ill people
29. Cost-effectiveness of intensive psychiatric community care for high users of inpatient services
30. Assertive community treatment and reference groups: An evaluation of their effectiveness for young adults with serious mental illness and substance abuse problems
31. The New Hampshire study of supported employment for people with severe mental illness
32. Variations in an assertive outreach model
33. The association between program characteristics and service delivery in assertive community treatment
34. Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: Development and use of a measure
35. Critical ingredients of assertive community treatment: Judgments of the experts
36. Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model
37. Fidelity to assertive community treatment and consumer outcomes in the New Hampshire dual disorders study
38. Rural intensive case management: A controlled study
39. Development, implementation, and monitoring of intensive psychiatric community care in the Department of Veterans Affairs
40. Research on field-based services: Models for reform in the delivery of mental health care to populations with complex clinical problems
41. Assertive community treatment initiatives: Results from a survey of selected state mental health authorities
42. Intensive Psychiatric Community Care (IPCC)
43. A multisite study of client outcomes in assertive community treatment
44. Comparing practice patterns of consumer and non-consumer mental health service providers
45. Consumers as peer specialists on intensive case management teams: Impact on clients
46. One-year outcomes of a randomized trial of case management with seriously mentally ill clients leaving jail
47. P/ACT dissemination and implementation from three states and the Department of Veterans Affairs
48. Training for state-funded providers of assertive community treatment
49. Community treatment teams: An alternative to state hospital
50. Retraining hospital staff for work in a community program in Wisconsin
51. The assertive community treatment worker: An emerging role and its implications for professional training
52. Using principles of ACT to integrate community care for people with mental retardation and mental illness
53. Personal Assistance in Community Existence (PACE): An alternative to PACT
54. Therapeutic limit setting in an assertive community treatment program
55. Client perspectives on critical ingredients of assertive community treatment
56. Transferring clients from intensive case management: Impact on client functioning
57. Preventing recurrent homelessness among mentally ill men: A "critical time" intervention after discharge from a shelter