The urban blind spot in environmental ethics

Environmental Politics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 7-35

  Light, A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; ETHICS; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; THEORETICAL STUDY; URBAN AREA;

EID: 0034966070     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/714000511     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. La Nature est morte, vive la nature!
2. On Norton and the failure of monistic inherentism
3. The wilderness idea revisited
4. Ruralism or environmentalism?
5. Rethinking communities: Environmental ethics in an urbanized world
6. Anthropocentrism: A misunderstood problem
7. Anthropocentrism
8. The city around us
9. Callicott and Naess on pluralism
10. Ecological restoration and the culture of nature: A pragmatic perspective
11. Elegy for a garden: Thoughts on an urban environmental ethic
12. Taking environmental ethics public
13. The politics of ecological restoration
14. Energy addicted in America
15. The shallow and the deep: Long-range ecology movements
16. Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism
17. Why i am not a nonanthropocentrist: Callicott and the failure of monistic inherentism
18. Book review: "Conserving natural value"
19. Democracy and sense of place values in environmental policy
20. Epistemology and intrinsic values: Norton and Callicott's critiques of Rolston
21. Life in the lap of luxury as ecosystems collapse
22. Animal liberation
23. The Dogma of anti-anthropocentrism and ecophilosophy
24. Is there a need for a new, an environmental ethic?
25. Are humans superior to animals and plants?
26. A critique of anti-anthropocentric biocentrsim