Explicit and implicit rationing: Taking responsibility and avoiding blame for health care choices

Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 163-169

  Ham, C ^a   Coulter, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b PICKER INSTITUTE EUROPE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; POLITICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW;

HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; EUROPE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; NEW ZEALAND; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 0034963268     PISSN: 13558196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/1355819011927422     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. The Oregon health plan and the political paradox of rationing: What advocates and critics have claimed and what Oregon did
2. Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost effectiveness meets the rule of rescue
3. Introduction: International experience of rationing (or priority setting)
4. Israel's basic basket of health services: The importance of being explicitly implicit
5. The politics of blame avoidance
6. Muddling through elegantly
7. Puzzling out priorities
8. Goodbye to the simple solutions
9. The ethics of accountability in managed care reform
10. Rationing health care in New Zealand - How the public has a say
11. Priority setting and health technology assessment: Beyond evidence-based medicine and cost-effectiveness analysis
12. Setting priorities: What is holding us back - Inadequate information or inadequate institutions?
13. Rationing and the health authority
14. Priority setting in the NHS: Reports from six districts
15. Healthcare rationing - Are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?
16. Goodbye to the simple solutions
17. The bias of American politics: Rationing health care in a weak state
18. Accountability for reasonableness
19. Just health care rationing: A democratic decision making approach