Nutech and non-physician assisted suicide: A reply to werth

Death Studies

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 413-418

  Ogden, Russel D ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT; DEATH; EUTHANASIA; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; POLICY; SOCIAL ASPECT; SUICIDE;

ASPHYXIA; DEATH; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; LEGISLATION, MEDICAL; SELF CARE; STATE GOVERNMENT; SUICIDE, ASSISTED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034960294     PISSN: 07481187     EISSN: 10917683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07481180125963     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Barrett, T. (1996, July11).MD’s criticized for suicide strategies. The Vancouver Sun, pp. A1, A2.
2. Humphrey, D. (2000). Final exit: The video. Junction City, OR: ERGO.
3. Magnusson, R. S., & Ballis, P. H. (1999).The response of health care workers to AIDS patients’ requests for euthanasia. Journal of Sociology, 35, 312-330.
4. McLaren, A., & McLaren, A.T. (1986).The bedroom and the state: the changing practices and politics of contraception and abortion in Canada, 1880-1980.Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
5. Neely, E. (2000, September 29). Assisted suicide case dismissed. The Post and Courier, p. A1, A13.
6. Reed, J. (1978). From private vice to public virtue: the birth control movement and American society since1830. New York: Basic Books.
7. Smith, G. (2000, September 16). Man faces charge of assisting suicide. The Post and Courier, p. A1.
8. Vacco v. Quill, 117 S Ct 2293 (1997).
9. Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S Ct 2258 (1997).
10. Werth, J. (2001). Policy and Psychosocial Considerations Associated with Non-Physician Assisted Suicide: A Commentary on Ogden. Death Studies, 25, 403-411.