Effects of retinoic acid upon eye field morphogenesis and differentiation

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 221, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 350-364

  Eagleson, Gerald W ^a   Johnson Meeter, Leanne J ^a   Frideres, Jennifer ^a  

^a LORAS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Determination; Differentiation; Eye field morphogenesis; TH immunohistochemistry

Indexed keywords

RETINOIC ACID; TYROSINE 3 MONOOXYGENASE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINERGIC NERVE CELL; EMBRYO; EYE; FOREBRAIN; GENE EXPRESSION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA DEVELOPMENT; TELENCEPHALON; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

LAMIINAE; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 0034960004     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.1149     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Acampora D, Simeone A. 1999. Understanding the role of Otx1 and Otx2‐6 in the control of brain morphogenesis. TINS 22: 116–122.
2. Ang S‐L, Conlon RA, Jin O, Rossant J. 1994. Positive and negative signals from the mesoderm regulate the expression of mouse Otx2‐6 in ectoderm explants. Development 120: 2979–2989.
3. Bourguignon C, Li J, Papalopulu N. 1998. XBF‐1, a winged helix transcription factor with dual activity, has a role in positioning neurogenesis in Xenopus competent ectoderm. Development 125: 4889–4900.
4. Constantine‐Paton M, Blum AS, Mendez‐Otero R, Barnstable CJ. 1986. A cell surface molecule distributed in a dorsoventral gradient in perinatal rat retina. Nature 324: 459–462.
5. Durston AJ, Timmermans JPM, Hage WJ M, Hendricks HFJ, de Vries NJ, Heideveld M, Nieuwkoop PD. 1989. Retinoic acid causes an anteroposterior transformation in the developing central nervous system. Nature 340: 140–147.
6. Eagleson GW, Harris WA. 1990. Mapping of the presumptive brain regions in the neural plate of Xenopus laevis. J Neurobiol 21: 427–441.
7. Eagleson GW, Ferreiro B, Harris WA. 1995. Fate of the neural ridge and morphogenesis of the Xenopus brain. J Neurobiol 28: 146–158.
8. Eagleson GW, Ubink R, Jenks BG, Roubos EW. 1998. Forebrain differentiation and axonogenesis in amphibians: I. Differentiation of the suprachiasmatic nucleus in relation to background adaptation behavior. Brain Behav Evol 52: 23–36.
9. Harland RM. 1991. In situ hybridization: an improved whole‐mount method for Xenopus embryos. In: Kay BK Peng HB, editors. Methods in cell biology. San Diego: Academic Press. p 685–695.
10. Huang S, Moody SA. 1992. Does lineage determine the dopamine phenotype in the tadpole hypothalamus?: a quantitative analysis. J Neurosci 12: 1351–1362.
11. Huh S‐O, Hatani V, Marcus RV, Li SC, Lai E. 1999. Dorsal‐ventral patterning defects in the eye of BF‐1 deficient mice associated with a restricted loss of shh expression. Dev Biol 211: 53–63.
12. Keller R, Shih J, Sater A. 1992. The cellular basis of the convergence and extension of the Xenopus neural plate. Dev Dyn 193: 199–217.
13. LaMantia A‐S, Colbert MC, Linney E. 1993. Retinoic acid induction and forebrain. Neuron 6: 1035–1048.
14. Li H‐s, Tierney C, Wen L, Wu JY, Rao Y. 1997. A single morphogenetic field gives rise to two retina primordia under the influence of the prechordal plate. Development 124: 603–615.
15. Manns M, Fritzsch B. 1991. The eye in the brain: retinoic acid effects morphogenesis of the eye and pathway selection of axons but not the differentiation of the retina in Xenopus laevis. Neurosci Lett 127: 150–154.
16. March‐Armstrong N, McCafferty P, Gilbert W, Dowling JE, Drager UC. 1994. Retinoic acid is necessary for development of the ventral retina in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 7286–7290.
17. Nieuwkoop PD. 1952. Activation and organization of the central nervous system in amphibians: I. Induction and activation: II. Differentiation and organization: III. Synthesis of a new working hypothesis. J Exp Zool 120: 1–106.
18. Nieuwkoop JD, Faber J. 1967. Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). 2nd ed. Amsterdam: North Holland.
19. Papalopulu N, Kintner C. 1996. A Xenopus gene, Xbr‐1, defines a novel class of homeobox genes and is expressed in the dorsal ciliary margin. Dev Biol 174: 104–114.
20. Papalopulu N, Clarke JDW, Bradley L, Wilkinson D, Krumlauf R, Holder N. 1991. Retinoic acid causes abnormal development and segmental patterning of the anterior hindbrain in Xenopus embryos. Development 113: 1145–1158.
21. Pituello F, Deruntz P, Pradayrol L, Duprat A‐M. 1989. Peptidergic properties expressed in vitro by embryonic neuroblasts after neural induction. Development 105: 529–540.
22. Rugh R. 1961. Experimental Embryology. Minneapolis: Burgess.
23. Sharpe CR. 1992. Retinoic acid and the late phase of neural induction. Development 1992 (Suppl): 203–207.
24. Tuinhof R, Gonzalez A, Smeets WJAJ, Scheenen W, Roubos EW. 1994. Central control of melanotrope cells in Xenopus laevis. Eur J Morphol 32: 307–310.
25. Wagner E, McCaffery P, Drager UC. 2000. Retinoic acid in the formation of the dorsoventral retina and its central projections. Dev Biol 222: 460–470.
26. Xuan J, Baptista C, Balas G, Tao W, Soares V, Lai E. 1995. Winged helix transcription factor BF‐1 is essential for the development of the cerebral hemispheres. Neuron 14: 1141–1152.
27. Ye W, Shimamura K, Rubenstein JLR, Hynes MA, Rosenthal A. 1998. FGF and Shh signals control dopaminergic and serotoninergic cell fate in the anterior neural plate. Cell 93: 755–766.