Problems with laparoscopic instruments: Opinions of experts

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 149-155

  Den Boer, K T ^a,b   De Jong, T ^b   Dankelman, J ^a   Gouma, D J ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BILE DUCT INJURY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGEON; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0034958127     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/10926420152389297     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Whither minimal access surgery: Tribulations and expectations
2. Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments
3. Human interface technology. An essential tool for the modern surgeon
4. The impact of technologies on minimally invasive therapy
5. The application of ergonomics in the work environment of general surgeons
6. A laparoscopic grasper with force perception
7. Pitfalls of minimally invasive surgery
8. Aspects of ergonomic system design applied to medical work systems computer integrated surgery
9. Force transmission of laparoscopic grasping instruments
10. Sensing and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery: Experiment, analysis, and observation
11. Assessing risks, costs, and benefits of laparoscopic hernia repair
12. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy
13. Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: Multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion
14. An introduction to risk analysis for medical devices
15. Man-machine aspects of minimally invasive surgery
16. Surgery 2001, a technological framework for the future
17. Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors; what can you feel?
18. High pressures are generated at the tip of laparoscopic graspers
19. Instruments for minimally invasive surgery: Principles of ergonomic handles
20. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills
21. Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display
22. Observation, manipulation, and eye-hand coordination problems in minimally invasive surgery
23. Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery - A human reliability analysis
24. Prehensile atraumatic grasper with intuitive ergonomics
25. Deflectable endoscopic instrument system DENIS
26. Quantitative analysis of the functionality and efficiency of three surgical dissection techniques: A time-motion analysis