Influence of bid and subsample vectors on the welfare measure estimate in dichotomous choice contingent valuation: Evidence from a case-study

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 253-265

  Judez L ^a   De Andres R ^b   Perez Hugalde C ^a   Urzainqui, E ^b   Ibaez, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b CSIC Instituto de Economia Geografia y Demografia IEGD   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dichotomous choice contingent valuation method; Environmental valuation; Survey design

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; RESOURCE VALUATION;

CASE-STUDIES; CONTINGENT VALUATION METHODS; DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION; DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION; SAMPLING DESIGN; SURVEY DESIGN; TRUNCATED MEAN; VALUATION SURVEYS; WELFARE MEASURES;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; METHODOLOGY; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; WELFARE ECONOMICS;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; RECREATION; SAMPLING; SIMULATION; SOCIAL WELFARE; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034956831     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jema.2000.0380     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Experimental design for binary data
2. Optimal designs for discrete choice contingent valuation surveys. Single-bound, double-bound and bivariate models
3. Valuation of the environment methods and techniques: The contingent valuation method
4. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
5. Measuring values of extra-market goods. Are indirect measures biased?
6. Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: Comment
7. Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys
8. Sensitivity of willingness-to-pay estimates to bid design in dichotomous choice contingent valuation models
9. Sensitivity of willingness-to-pay estimates to bid design in dichotomous choice contingent valuation models: Reply
10. Inference and optimal design for a welfare measure in dichotomous choice contingent valuation
11. Comparing three approaches that generate bids for the referendum contingent valuation method
12. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses
13. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses: Reply
14. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation
15. Evolución y caracteristicas de los visitantes del Parque Nacional de las Tablas de Daimiel
16. Evaluation contingente de l'usage récréatif d'une réserve naturelle humide
17. Optimal experiments in double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation
18. Bias in discrete response contingent valuation
19. Sensitivity of willingness-to-pay estimates to bid design in dichotomous choice contingent valuation models: Comment
20. A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies
21. Contingent valuation and social choice
22. Optimal design for binary data
23. Statistical approaches to the fat tail problem for dichotomous choice contingent valuation
24. Wilderness canoeing in Ontario. Using cumulative results to update dichotomous choice contingent valuation offer amounts
25. The sensitivity of CV outcomes to CV survey methods
26. Contingent valuation in a policy context. The national oceanic and atmospheric administration report and its implications for the use of contingent valuation method in policy analysis in Britain
27. Optimal design for percentile estimation of a quantal response curve