AJCC stage groupings for head and neck cancer: Should we look at alternatives? A report of the head and neck sites task force

Head and Neck

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 607-612

  Lydiatt, William M ^a   Shah, Jatin P ^b   Hoffman, Henry T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER INVASION; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; DISEASE COURSE; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SCORING SYSTEM;

HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; NEOPLASM STAGING;

EID: 0034954182     PISSN: 10433074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hed.1086     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Biological staging of head and neck cancer and its role in developing effective treatment strategies
2. Clinical staging of oropharyngeal carcinoma. A critical evaluation of a new stage grouping proposal
3. Using TNM staging to predict survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head & neck
4. Purposes, problems, and proposals for progress in cancer staging
5. Superiority of the T and N Integer Score (TANIS) staging system for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity
6. A comparison between TNM and Tanis stage grouping for predicting prognosis of oral and oropharyngeal cancer
7. The importance of correct stage grouping in oncology. Results of a nationwide study of oropharyngeal carcinoma in the Netherlands
8. Comparison of the additions of T and N Integer Scores with TNM stage groups in head and neck cancer
9. The importance of correct stage grouping in oncology: Results of a nationwide study of oropharyngeal carcinoma in the Netherlands
10. Stage grouping reliability: TNM '97 versus TANIS in laryngeal cancer
11. Is the new TNM (1997) the best system for predicting prognosis?
12. Stage grouping of oropharyngeal cancer: Evaluation of three systems by survival analysis
13. The importance of correct stage grouping in oncology. Results of a nationwide study of oropharyngeal carcinoma in the Netherlands
14. Die prognostische relevanz des TNM-systems fur oropharynxkarzinome
15. A comparison of published head and neck stage groupings in carcinoma of the oral cavity