|
Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 659-670
|
The influence of a dominating centre on a quantitative systematic review of granisetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting
|
Author keywords
Granisetron; Meta analysis; Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV); Publication bias; Quantitative systematic review
|
Indexed keywords
GRANISETRON;
CALCULATION;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOSE RESPONSE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
META ANALYSIS;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA;
POSTOPERATIVE VOMITING;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PUBLICATION;
QUANTITATIVE ASSAY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
REVIEW;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ANTIEMETICS;
DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC;
GRANISETRON;
HUMANS;
MEDLINE;
MULTICENTER STUDIES;
POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
|
EID: 0034953018
PISSN: 00015172
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045006659.x Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (59)
|
References (53)
|