|
Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2001, Pages
|
Relative efficacy of an angiotensin II antagonist compared with other antihypertensive agents. Olmesartan medoxomil versus antihypertensives
a a a |
Author keywords
Angiotensin II receptor antagonist; Atenolol; Captopril; Comparator; Efficacy; Essential hypertension; Hydrochlorothiazide; Losartan; Olmesartan medoxomil; Safety
|
Indexed keywords
ANGIOTENSIN 1 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST;
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;
ATENOLOL;
CAPTOPRIL;
HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE;
LOSARTAN;
OLMESARTAN;
PLACEBO;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
ADULT;
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE ACTIVITY;
BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;
DOSE RESPONSE;
DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG SAFETY;
DRUG TOLERABILITY;
ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION;
HUMAN;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
REVIEW;
|
EID: 0034951613
PISSN: 09521178
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200106001-00007 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (72)
|
References (9)
|