Lessons from Holland: Hospital visiting as an instrument to assess the quality of obstetric and gynecological care

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 158-162

  Lips, Jos P ^a   Wildschut, Hajo I J ^a   Calvert, J P ^b  

^a Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NVOG)   (Netherlands)

^b Oranje Nassaulaan 121 ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Gynecological group practices; Visitation of obstetric

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GYNECOLOGY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; OBSTETRIC CARE; ORGANIZATION; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0034947650     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00524-8     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Recertification in the United States
2. Revalidation in Australia and New Zealand: approach of Royal Australasian College of Physicians
3. Revalidation of doctors in Canada
4. Reregistration of medical specialists in the Netherlands
5. Dutch system of peer review is different and effective
6. Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice
7. King's Fund organizational audit: more than ticks in boxes
8. Measuring hospital performance: are we asking the right questions?
9. Setting up inter-departmental peer review. The British Thoracic Society's scheme
10. Five-year results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario