Inquiries - High costs, unacceptable side effects and low effectiveness: Time for revision

Australasian Psychiatry

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 156-160

  Hobbs, P ^a  

^a Canterbury District Health Board ^*  (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Critical incidents; Inquiries; Psychiatry

Indexed keywords

NEUROLEPTIC AGENT;

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EMERGENCY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HOSPITAL SERVICE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LIFE EVENT; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; NEGLIGENCE; PREDICTION; PROPHYLAXIS; PSYCHIATRIST; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; RISK MANAGEMENT; SIDE EFFECT;

EID: 0034943296     PISSN: 10398562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1665.2001.00323.x     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Complaints against psychiatrists: Mechanism and uses
2. Inquiries after homicide in England and Wales
3. Six years' experience in Oxford: Review of serious incidents
4. A South Australian coronial inquiry into suicide and homicide
5. Changing patterns in the use of the Mental Health Act 1983 in England 1984-1996
6. Homicide inquiries: What sense do they make?
7. Suicide in psychiatric hospital inpatients: Risk factors and their predictive power
8. Safer services: Conclusions from the report of the National Confidential Inquiry
9. Patients' responsibility for their suicidal behaviour
10. Suicide litigation: From legal to clinical wisdom
11. Variations in psychiatric practice: Neither unacceptable nor unavoidable only under researched
12. The psychological autopsy approach to studying suicide: A review of methodological issues
13. Incident monitoring in psychiatry
14. Psychiatric trainees' experiences of, and reactions to, patient suicide
15. The new Civil Procedure Rules: 2. Part 35 provisions and their implications