Rorschach administration: A comparison of the effect of two instructions

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 461-471

  Hartmann, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY;

EID: 0034942121     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7603_07     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Interobserver agreement, intraobserver reliability, and the Rorschach Comprehensive system
2. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
3. The Rorschach: Projective technique or psychometric test?
4. The effect of administration method: A comparison of the Rapaport and Exner Rorschach systems
5. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis
6. Allocation of energy and Rorschach productivity
7. Problems with brief protocols
8. Rorschach interrater agreement estimates: An empirical evaluation
9. Administrering av Rorschachmetoden. En teoretisk drøfting av ulike instruksjoner
10. The method of administration of the Rorschach ink-blot test
11. The measurement of agreement for categorical data
12. The influence of situational and interpersonal variables in projective testing
13. Effects of environmental stimulation on M, FM, and m responses in the Rorschach
14. The comprehensive system for the Rorschach: A critical examination