Extracting aquatic mites from stream substrates: A comparison of three methods

Experimental and Applied Acarology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-11

  Proctor, Heather C ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Extraction; Halacaroidea; Hydracarina; Hydrachnida; Oribatida

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER;

AQUATIC ORGANISM; EXTRACTION METHOD; MITE; SUBSTRATE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; MITE;

ANIMALS; FRESH WATER; MITES;

EID: 0034941759     PISSN: 01688162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010677700404     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. A method for separating benthic arthropods from detritus
2. Water mites from Australia
3. Comparison of soil extraction methods for nematodes and microarthropods
4. Using artificial substrata to monitor how cryptofaunal Acari colonize littoral algae on sub-Antarctic South Georgia
5. Contemporary quantitative approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates
6. Effects of habitat complexity on macroinvertebrate colonization of artificial substrates in north temperate lakes
7. Water mites
8. AusRivAS: Using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition in rivers in Western Australia
9. Long-term recovery of a mountain stream from clear-cut logging: The effects of forest succession on benthic invertebrate community structure
10. A heptane floatation method for recovering microarthropods from semiarid soils, with comparison to the Merchant-Crossley high-gradient extraction method and estimates of microarthropod biomass
11. A computer-based development of the Biological Monitoring Working Party score system incorporating abundance rating, site type and indicator value